Symmetric variation, first line:
Half Mujannah vs Half Mujannah (20)
After 24. Af5 Af4 White plays 25.Rac1! and Black defends with 25...a6.
Continuing from previous after 28. Axc5+
Half Mujannah vs Half Mujannah (table IV)
Sort:
Symmetric variation, second line:
Half Mujannah vs Half Mujannah (21)
After 24. Af5 Af4 White plays 25.Rac1! and Black defends with 25...c5.
continuing from previous after 29. Ah3
Symmetric variation, third line:
Half Mujannah vs Half Mujannah (22)
After 24. Af5 Af4 White plays 25.Rac1! and Black defends with 25...Rac8.
Finished.
Option B = bad as a general rule
Well, apparently the 'bad move' wins!
Well, I guess this is a real example of "bad moves win"... 
Hey Nguyen my friend, here I am talking about Chaturanga, not about modern Chess!
You have played it only once: https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturanga/game/63283218/67/1
Do you remember?
https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturanga/game/63283218/0/1
Taken from "A History of Chess" by H.J.R. Murray. The board is mirrored: Kings are on the e-file!
Half Mujannah vs Half Mujannah (19)
Once again, the analysis given here starts with a weak move for White. So I suppose that better options will follow.