HI guyzzzzz,,, new variant: Royalty Transfer chess

Sort:
Avatar of xzvcnx

ok, uve seen a lot of new variant suggestions. 

But here is my idea (well, one I saw on another chess website)

So, there is two kings. But at a time, only one of them can be active. An active king needs to be :

Closer to the h-file
If they are on the same file, closer to the back rank

If they move in a way as the non-active king and the active ones exchange roles, they cannot get into check. Castling is available for both kings, both sides.

When an active king is in check, the inactive king can become active so the position is legal

-1 if u don't like, +1 if u do.

Let me no if u have ne qs.

wink.png

Avatar of HerakIes

-1

Avatar of Chess_Monk1

-1

Avatar of xzvcnx

@qfcbv thanks

Extra rules:

Both kings do not have to go in check. If the opposing player checkmates the active king, and there is no way to make it inactive, then that player wins.

Probably favee non-chess.com chess variant lol

Avatar of xzvcnx
qfcbv wrote:
nnnnn034 wrote:

ok, uve seen a lot of new variant suggestions. 

But here is my idea (well, one I saw on another chess website)

So, there is two kings. But at a time, only one of them can be active. An active king needs to be :

Closer to the h-file
If they are on the same file, closer to the back rank

If they move in a way as the non-active king and the active ones exchange roles, they cannot get into check. Castling is available for both kings, both sides.

When an active king is in check, the inactive king can become active so the position is legal

-1 if u don't like, +1 if u do.

Let me no if u have ne qs.

 

so if one king gets taken the other can still continue the game? like sparta, greece??

If the inactive king gets taken, and it can, the other king is permanently active.

Avatar of sfxe

I kinda like it but make the name shorter, Royalty Transfer just doesn't have that ring to it, ya know?

You have Antichess, KOTH, 3-Check, Torpedo, and all these other variants but Royalty Transfer is just kinda too long.

Avatar of xzvcnx
qfcbv wrote:
nnnnn034 wrote:

ok, uve seen a lot of new variant suggestions. 

But here is my idea (well, one I saw on another chess website)

So, there is two kings. But at a time, only one of them can be active. An active king needs to be :

Closer to the h-file
If they are on the same file, closer to the back rank

If they move in a way as the non-active king and the active ones exchange roles, they cannot get into check. Castling is available for both kings, both sides.

When an active king is in check, the inactive king can become active so the position is legal

-1 if u don't like, +1 if u do.

Let me no if u have ne qs.

 

so if one king gets taken the other can still continue the game? like sparta, greece??

If the INACTIVE king gets TAKEN, the other is permanently active, but can continue. If the ACTIVE king gets CHECKMATED, that king's player loses.

Avatar of xzvcnx
Chessguy149 wrote:

I kinda like it but make the name shorter, Royalty Transfer just doesn't have that ring to it, ya know?

You have Antichess, KOTH, 3-Check, Torpedo, and all these other variants but Royalty Transfer is just kinda too long.

hmmm, ok

*brainstorming new name*

ok can't think of it lol

Avatar of HerakIes
qfcbv wrote:
HerakIes wrote:

-1

Say "why"!

why

Avatar of xzvcnx
HerakIes wrote:
qfcbv wrote:
HerakIes wrote:

-1

Say "why"!

why

@qfcbv was talking 2 be dude but yea y

Avatar of HerakIes
nnnnn034 wrote:
HerakIes wrote:
qfcbv wrote:
HerakIes wrote:

-1

Say "why"!

why

@qfcbv was talking 2 be dude but yea y

That's pretty incorrect, as he quoted me, but whatever.

Avatar of xzvcnx
HerakIes wrote:
nnnnn034 wrote:
HerakIes wrote:
qfcbv wrote:
HerakIes wrote:

-1

Say "why"!

why

@qfcbv was talking 2 be dude but yea y

That's pretty incorrect, as he quoted me, but whatever.

yea sheesh k

Avatar of xzvcnx

omg i cant think of new name instead of Royalty Transfer, as @Chessguy149 said, but can't omg lol

Avatar of TheUltraTrap

Looks very very fun!

+1

Also, if you come with a rook or queen to the h file, closer to the back rank than the active king is and both kings are on that file it will be skewermate right? We need to consider that expression, cause it is not a direct checkmate, is because the rush would cause a royalty transfer. So it's a skewer that mates. If the inactive king is in check and you forever the active king to make the inactive one active, or you dork and force it, it is forcemate or forkmate.

So many things to explore.

+1,000

Avatar of xzvcnx

If the Inactive king is in check, white doesn't have to get out of it, although he usually should.

Also, pawns can promote to king.

Avatar of 1e4c6_O-1

this has already been invented. 

Avatar of xzvcnx

Yeah, but not in chess.com

Avatar of Lukenotfound

+1 looks fun can’t wait for a new variant 

Avatar of KnockKnockItstheFBI

-1

Avatar of tacticspotter

I would just name it kings

short and simple just a joke lol