Whynot
whnot
whnot
because it is not worth it. This would also remove a lot of the complexity of chess due to move orders in openings. This would pretty much make a bunch of stuff interchangeable, especially d4 positions.
That would bring more life to the game. Instead of piece being jammed in by pawns and pieces.
In 4 player it would add more life to the game
You have pawns moving in all direction why cant you do that??
because that's not how pawns move...? They're meant to be the weakest piece on the board, so giving them too many abilities would essentially make them too strong that they would alter the game completely
no this pawn should be called a hopper, I like the idea, but it should be a separate piece.
agree.
Hoppers, especially grasshoppers, are interesting and even elegant compositional pieces, but I am not convinced that they make the best game pieces. Their power decreases as the game progresses.
because that's not how pawns move...? They're meant to be the weakest piece on the board, so giving them too many abilities would essentially make them too strong that they would alter the game completely
not if u r playing chaturanga (the afil are actually crap)
alfils aren't meant to be good lol
ik, I just sac them for pawns most of the time bc pawns are more valuable
If pawn can move two space on its first move
If there a piece in front of it
How about pawn can jump over any piece on its first move ??