You sure that after 20+ moves, a pawn sac is going to make that happen?
How To Counter Stafford Gambit! >:)
Sort:
SAOCM wrote:
You sure that after 20+ moves, a pawn sac is going to make that happen?
Most of it, yeah.
Feb 1, 2024
0
#4
So... ChessKy538... Your logic is flawed. You don't win because of the Gambit, you win cuz your opponent doesn't know how to move pieces.
hrm16 wrote:
So... ChessKy538... Your logic is flawed. You don't win because of the Gambit, you win cuz your opponent doesn't know how to move pieces.
To be fair, according to Game Review, all except 1 or 2 moves were great!
Feb 1, 2024
0
#6
No offence but your opponent would have to play the best move most of the time. Which doesn’t happen in the lower elo range as most people don’t know how to play against it
Feb 1, 2024
0
#7
or just... use a 5 move refutation that gets white into a +2 position for free every game
Nxc6 dxc6 f3 +-
Feb 1, 2024
0
#9
KindCuteElephant wrote:
Nh5 isn’t the best move… just an obvious trap
I haven't checked recently but the Nh5 f5 line I shared is best? Last used SF 14 to check I think...
ChessKy538 wrote:
I've heard about this variation of the Petrov Defence that is really popular because of its large amounts of traps, but if you counter them, you have an advantage! Lots of people struggle with this but don't worry! With a match I played with barely any mistakes, I'll show you how to make the Stafford Gambit look stupid since there's no way of stopping it's defeat! I hope this helps you and let me know what you think in the comments.
Bruh , why did black castle
I've heard about this variation of the Petrov Defence that is really popular because of its large amounts of traps, but if you counter them, you have an advantage! Lots of people struggle with this but don't worry! With a match I played with barely any mistakes, I'll show you how to make the Stafford Gambit look stupid since there's no way of stopping it's defeat! I hope this helps you and let me know what you think in the comments.