HOW Universe Started

We start at the moment of our Big Bang.  Time = 0.  Just a moment before, the only thing here is Zu.  Zu is full of non-vibrating Time, (unused time), just the amount to produce the first particle (Eu) and start time.   Now at the center of Zu is Eu, the first particle in three dimensions.  Zu is a zero dimensional universe and Eu is our entire universe.  Anything built from 3 preons is a particle, it is like space and has a volume.  The smallest volume particle is Sm, supermass, about 10**-252 m**3.  Eu is about 10**40 times bigger and has that many Sm particles in it.  We have just looked at Eu as if being in Zu.  Just the opposite is true if we are in Eu and looking at Zu.  Zu is a speck in our space and is everywhere.  Zu and Eu are two different universe frames and the translation from one to the other is:  D/h = 1/n, everywhere, all the time.  This is an approximation; it assumes the universes are continuous.  One of the reasons this is hard to understand is that for there to be a distance, one must also have time pass.  We are looking as if time is stopped.  Now T = 10**-84 secs. later, there are 3 particles in Zu,  Eu less a little energy and the two supermass particles.  These two are sitting on either side of Eu and "came out" of Eu at the very end of the E tidom.  One on each side.  In Zu the 3 are sitting as close as can be.   Each tick of time, two more Sms will appear, very close to Eu and the first 2 Sms, but just a little further away from Eu and rotated, as Eu has less energy each tick. If we look at these events from Our universe's point of view, things are much different. The translation is of the form R = 1/r.  So the closer things are in Zu the further apart they are in our universe.  At this time our universe has only Eu sitting right in the middle and the 2nd and 3rd particles on either side.  But the distance that we would see is 50 billion light years between the 3 particles, all in a straight line.  There is NOTHING else.  No space anywhere.  No movement of the 3 particles relative to each other.   No gravity, no temperature, no space. The three were "placed" in Zu.  They are placed in our universe.    The 4th and 5th particles are each very close to either the 2nd or 3rd.  These particles will occur 10**40 times for the next 10**40 ticks of time.  That ends at T = 10**-44 secs.  To understand "placed", the mass of Eu came from Zu as unused energy.  There is no momentum, no movement of mass.  The same is true for all the Sm particles.  As Eu decays, one of the tidoms changes length and rotates very little.  It increases as the energy decreases. Thus the placement of the two Sm particles in Zu increases which is a decrease in what will be our universe.  There is no movement of mass in our universe.  Inflation was a translation between Zu and our universe.  The reasons the galaxies are not moving much now are:  One: All the mass in the universe was at rest with the center of mass.  Two; They were placed there and there are no gravitons yet. Three: The center of any galaxy is at rest with the center of mass of that galaxy. Four:  The resulting vector force on any center of mass of the galaxy is nearly zero as there is about equal masses in all directions.  Five:  The amount of mass of any galaxy is so large that galaxies do not move much.  The Bullet Cluster is rare.  The universe is not expanding.  Five; The redshift we see which seems to increase with distance from us does occur.  It is not from the center of galaxies moving away.  It is from real photons aging.  The functions of distance and age are linear.  Those photons are redshifted because the photon uses energy to tick, to move from space block to space block.  Because real photons are all the wrong frequency to move thru space compared to all other virtual particles, they use (lose) a lot more energy in comparison and that is what we see as redshift.

  If one draw a line between all even particles and also all odd numbered particles, these lines will lie on the surface of half a football, then on the surface of a second half football on the inside of the first and so on and on.  One line is in one half and the other in the other half.   In fact, this line is the high density matter in our universe and can be seen now. 

Here are  things that are different from most theories of the Big  Bang.  1.  Inflations is over, no laws of physics were broken.  No space doubled, nothing moved faster than light.  The time is T= 10**-44 sec.  The "matter", supermass is evenly distributed over the entire volume of universe, about 100 BLY between edges.   The biggest piece is about 10**40 times smaller than Eu.  2.  The matter, antimatter are in the 2 different halves of the universe.  there was NEVER any interaction between the two.   The two halves are exactly equal in size.  3.  The universe sits in Zu.  Outside the universe is a void, ie Zu.  The middle is the same void.   4.  The highest mass density will be along the line drawn between Sm particles and should be visible now.  5.  There is NO motion of particles relative to each other.  They were ALL placed in Zu with no motion. 6.  There are no forces as we know them yet, no gravity, no photons, no gluons.  There still is no space, no temperature and there will not be any force of gravity between Sms for another 100,000 years  Each Sm particle will break down into the unit mass and that will then break down into the space particles.    Particles can NOT move from one place to another until there is space enough for them to move thru.   To get space from one Sm particle to the next will take about 100,000 years.  7.  The temperature is much lower than thought in most theories.  The Sm particle was only 10**-40 of the mass at the start of the BB.  8.  Space keeps growing, larger and larger, first from the decay of the unit mass to the space particle until later when space is produced in a star.   Today space has filled the volume of the universe and is how greater and slowly moving into the voids on the outside of our universe and into the middle.

How, why and which particles will create a new particle as their time cycle start ?  A tiedom may be considered to be in one of two states, either the point in common is an end point, (zero configuration) or the common point is somewhere else, (nonzero configuration). ALL these nonzero configurations are the property of charge or color. The difference occurs at the start of the time cycle. For the end point condition the time pulse moves down the original tiedom from the end point. Since time and distance are the same thing, just two different properties, the tiedom’s length is regenerated, new length, new time.  For the nonzero configuration, the time pulse moves down the length generating  a new time cycle, but it also starts in the opposite direction, thus two pulses.  That length is already being generated by the first pulse, so the second pulse moves off at right angles right into Zu.   This is how ALL tiedoms are generated. The time and length are one thing and we now have the start of a new tiedom in Zu. That only stops when we have three tiedoms and a new particle. This new tiedom is the first in the new particle and is the controlling factor. The first tiedom is the lead tiedom in all time changes. It will determine the properties of the particle and the direction the particle will move in space. For fermions this is the H tiedom with 4 different states and 4 different particles. The other two tiedoms states are determined by this H tiedom.

The most difficult problem in all of elementary physics is how the electron stays in orbit around a proton. Why, because we have a particle, then a system of particles, the proton, then the next bigger system, a system of a particle and a system of particles, the proton. We are using the fact that neither time nor distance are continuous.  So, let’s start with how a photon is created when an electron is captured into orbit, either from outside the system or an electron already in orbit that is changing to a low energy orbit. There is only one photon created and it contains the total energy between the initial energy and the finial energy in the new orbit. This happens all at “once”. That means that it is the finial orbit that decides the exact energy and not until the electron is completely in that orbit. Let’s use the case where the electron is outside the proton system, the energy chain for bosons is of length R*L. Thus, for a proton the 3 charge quarks are producing charged bosons in 6 direction on a plane. Each charged bosons then interacts with itself producing 3 more charged bosons in the form of the edges of a cube. These then interact with them selves and soon the entire space around the proton is full of energy chains in the form of a cube. This is the umbrella or blanket effect. It is 3D, not 2D. So as the electron approaches it will interact with a chain sooner or later. The electron’s normal speed is to stay in a spock some 100 ticks. The momentum of the electron may divided into 2 parts. That part that is needed to be in orbit and the part in excess. The excess part is given up by creating additional charged bosons systems. These continue to interact with themselves and nothing new happens. The process continuous until the electrons momentum ONLY agrees with that needed to be in orbit. At that time the entire excess energy is converted into a photon with exactly the excess energy and the electron is in orbit. This happens as the electron moves to the next spock and the existing spock creates the photon from the energy that was in excess and is now in the original spock.

A tiedom is energy. The excess energy is in the 3 L tiedoms of the spock. When time changes for these tiedoms the excess energy is in the initial new L tiedom of the photon and that creates the other 2 H tiedoms and we have a photon moving in the direction of the L tiedom. Only spocks can create a photon. The mirror is a 2^nd example.  The photon interacts with a particle in the mirror. Again the energy is divided into 2 parts, that parallel to the surface and that into the mirror. This second energy moves a particle in the mirror and that particle increases its potential energy. The particle then returns to its original state and the spock now has the parallel part and an equal but opposite part to create a new photon that we see.

That's exactly what I've been saying for years ...

Gee ! That is nice of you, I really mean that.   Which line did you agree with ?

You will find the updated and revised forums at "Physics 1st".

To repeat a question I have frequently asked, where is the scientific method in your ideas? If you cannot identify its role, you cannot claim this is science at all.

There are so many undefined terms, this treatment is meaningless as it stands. I open-mindedly struggled through about two thirds of it and came to the conclusion that there is simply nothing here to analyze.

             THAT CHESS.COM IS ONE NUTTY WEBSITE!

I thank both of you for trying (Elroch, cnj511).  To help you a little;  the unidentified terms may come from not reading the forums in order, read how time started and how time ticks first. AND I don't claim this is science, it's physics.  Maybe if you could find someone to help you read it you might understand it better.  

No, it's scifi. I am serious.

Let's see;  you two are unable to find some one to help you, can't read the forums in order, can't ask a question when you should, still believe GR is correct when there are 100 new theories ALL try to correct GR, tell us that time and length aren't discrete except when they are very small and tell me there is no such thing as a space particle but answer that space is space/time when asked some properties of your space.  The results of that is I would rather write good SCIFI than even come close to reason the way you do.  Now if you are UNABLE to contribute to how the universe started , may I suggest you find your oun forum to comment in.  YOU are pretty near stopping anyone else from contribuing in this site !!  BUT should you still be interested in learning, I want to reoffer to answer any questions. Thank you.  

I thought that every one ought to know that only the spock can create a Photon.  There are a lot of photons.  And most of you do not even understand a spock.  Probability the single most powerful statement in current PHYSICS.  ONLY A SPOCK PRODUCES A PHOTON.  I am sure you are interested .

That's science fiction, unrelated to any real-world observations.

If it is scifi , what are you afraid of ?  How can it be "UNRELATED to any real observation" ?  It's the ONLY thing that produces photons for your Observations.  But if you are afraid to talk about it , most people can understand that.   But anyway; a least now you know. 

Just saying your ideas are related to photons is not scientifically meaningful. Providing a way to calculate interaction probabilities or something like that would provide evidence they are not pure fiction.

That is what all Repeblicans or religious people do; say one thing and do the opposite.  If I say A is true and you say A is false (scifi), I have to prove it with math and we are to understand you are RIGHT with NO math.  And on top of that your math assumes distance is continuous and time too and that all points in time have one value.  ALL 4 of those conceptes are WRONG, some MATH !!!

We start at the moment of our Big Bang.  Time = 0.  Just a moment before, the only thing here is Zu.  Zu is full of non-vibrating Time, (unused time), just the amount to produce the first particle (Eu) and start time. 

It states Zu was here first.  IF it wasn't please tell us what was.  Zu has unused time, If it has someing else please tell us what.  Eu is the first particle. If it wasn't please tell us what was, or there wasn't a first particle.  Your math uses continuous distance, please tell us ONE THING that is continuous.  ALL observations show ALL things are discreate.    How can that statement be scifi ?   That is EVERY observation,  Every one !!!!   So I ask the question again, what are you afraid of ?  Answer the questions.