I solved Collatz conjecture

Sort:
Avatar of Platformativeperfection

Just use Pi

Avatar of Shri_Bo2

Um.... no.

The collatz conjecture only applies n to the set of all positive integers. Not transcendental numbers.

Avatar of Platformativeperfection

1.1 then

or just any decimal number?

Avatar of Shri_Bo2
Platsack wrote:

1.1 then

or just any decimal number?

1.1 is a decimal not integer.

Avatar of Platformativeperfection

So then negative numbers?

Avatar of Shri_Bo2

Positive integers so like:

0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9....infinity

Avatar of Platformativeperfection

m ok

Avatar of SVUDrBell

Please don't post stuff like how you solved the Collatz conjecture on here. You did not prove the Collatz conjecture, even if you think you did. If you show me your 'proof,' I could tell you why it doesn't work, but you would have to promise to not fight against me.

This is a club where people who like both math and chess can belong, and where we can share interesting things we've seen in math. But please don't try to promote your 'proof' of the Collatz conjecture. This isn't the place for it.

Avatar of Platformativeperfection

k

Avatar of Shri_Bo2

you could do things like that on r/mathmemes or r/math.

Avatar of crystal0192
wrote:

Positive integers so like:

0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9....infinity

no the set of all natural numbers not including 0

Avatar of Shri_Bo2

Oh... my bad... yeah I forgot