I sue everyone with a pfp with a white backgound with "-Road to GM-" in it for 9000 mp

Sort:
Avatar of lchenpku

People having the same pfp is causing me a lot of trouble. I can't tell the Road to GM people apart unless I bother to look at their usernames. Here is a list of people that I know that has that pfp:

  • joseph7505
  • Nightly-Knight
  • Scrobblelotcher
  • Prince_USA
  • R_2_GM (I sue him for extra mp's for having a username that's literally the club's name)
  • GradyW15925267 (I sue him for extra mp's for having a long username that takes a long time to type)
  • R2GMBlogs (I sue him for extra mp's for having a username with "R2GM" in it)
  • nolmAparrot (I sue him for extra mp's for being the most annoying)
Avatar of Bruvoskity

R2GM pfpers...Check the rules for this club. No suing any pfper for pfper actions

Avatar of lchenpku

what about suing people for their usernames?

Avatar of Bruvoskity

That's just lame...You can't sue R2GM accounts because they aren't people

Avatar of lchenpku

ok

Avatar of GradyW15925267

hey, if you knew what the number was, and plus you can juyst call me "Grady" what's wrong with that

Avatar of noImAparrot
Nightly-Knight wrote:

R2GM pfpers...Check the rules for this club. No suing any pfper for pfper actions

We can disobey dumb and biased rules

Avatar of Bruvoskity

then you will be kicked from court house

Avatar of noImAparrot
Nightly-Knight wrote:

then you will be kicked from court house

Are biased rules allowed?

Take this example

A white supremacist, makes a rule that you cannot be black.

Is that fair or biased?

Avatar of Bruvoskity

Is it fair to say that the police (Law enforcement) should not exist? NO, that' cringe.

Avatar of noImAparrot
Nightly-Knight wrote:

Is it fair to say that the police (Law enforcement) should not exist? NO, that' cringe.

Well that is what I am saying, YOU are proving my point

Avatar of Bruvoskity

no, I am saying that's it's stupid to say police shouldn't exist...It's also stupid to say rules shouldn't exist when they are perfectly fine rules, not biased.

Anyone can sue a pfper, just not for doing pfper actions. Nothing wrong with that

Avatar of noImAparrot

You literally just did, you basically said, that you can't have biased rules, so the racist example is not biased? Look again lol

Being biased is the biggest problem for a judge or law enforcers, you, a pfper, by making the rule, you defend the pfpers.

Avatar of noImAparrot

One word:

BIASED 

Avatar of Bruvoskity

IT IS NOT BIASED!

The pfpers was made only to promote R2GM and protect it. Everything that is allowed in pfpers to do is completely legal for Road to GM. There is no biased here

Avatar of noImAparrot

How is the rule not protecting PFPERS?