hi
Imbalanced Aborts
Aquí tienes tres abortos de tres partidas que ni siquiera he visto, las puse a jugar y sin hacerlo me las dieron por perdidas, me he quejado y no aceptaré la indiferencia, desde que me hicieron esto no he jugado más y caso de que quede así, pensaré en dejar el juego, estoy muy enfadado. Las partidas no fueron todas desde el mismo ordenador, ni con la misma conexión a la Red, por si acaso se les ocurre alguno de sus comentarios típicos.
4 minFFA
Apr 2 8:59 AM • 1' • 4p • Aborted
filthycasual75 (1500) +0
10Dutch10 (1642) +0
SmasherThem (1964) +0
JuanjoCuPe (2156) -12.8
4 minFFA
Apr 2 6:40 AM • 1' • 1p • Aborted
Betelyuz (2352) +0
RoronoaDSorrow (2133) +0
enriquemaldonado (2079) +0
JuanjoCuPe (2169) -13.3
4 minFFA
Apr 2 4:33 AM • 1' • 4p • Aborted
Car59 (1804) +0
7_sniper_7 (2238) +0
SmasherThem (1965) +0
JuanjoCuPe (2180) -11.2
Hello. I do not often complain about 4pc, since I think it has issues but they will be worked out eventually. But the incredible and unfair abort imbalance is unnecessary. For example, a 2400 I had abort a game with me lost 2.3 rating. Reasonable, right? A penalty, but hey, maybe they had to leave suddenly. Meanwhile, I abort the same game and lose 10-20 points. what part of this is fair? I am higher rated, so I have less privilege to leave a game if something happens? I think that aborts should be a set amount overall, like say -5. It could maintain the system of increased cost if you abort many games in a row, but still based on set values for everyone. There's really no reason a high rated player should lose more.
Thank you.