In this game game review said I played like a 2200, is that accurate?

Sort:
Stay_loose_play_7deuce

This is the game: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/108773973767?tab=review

EplaSafi

I personally don't trust them (im 2000, when I win it always says I'm playing like a GM lol) but they are often fairly accurate and you did play a great game. So yea your level in that game was probably that of a 2200

Stay_loose_play_7deuce

I just played this game and it said 2150, I think it makes sense. https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/108778242833?tab=review&move=45

IcyMdog

From what I've seen, Chess.com almost always inflates it. I think it's because they want more people to play more and feel proud of themselves. Brilliant moves also support this. Although, you did play extremely well and you should be proud of it but take the estimated rating with a grain of salt.

Reporter_Tintin
IcyMdog wrote:

From what I've seen, Chess.com almost always inflates it. I think it's because they want more people to play more and feel proud of themselves. Brilliant moves also support this. Although, you did play extremely well and you should be proud of it but take the estimated rating with a grain of salt.

Yes, IcyMdog is right. But in my point of view 2200 rating game makes sense bcoz the game review rating depends on the way the opponent plays.... and in this game you smashed your opponent in the endgame that's why......

Eadwig2

If you take the PGN and alter the player's ratings to, say, half what they are now, review will give an entirely different score.

It is a bit of a fun gimmick, not really objective at all.

When it was first in beta I was 800 and lost to a 2400 and it said I played like a 2500 and she a 2800. I pointed out just how ludicrous this was and chess.com eventually toned it down. The same game reviewed now gives me a 1750 rating, which is still wildly wrong, because it is very much dependent on the opponent's rating. https://www.chess.com/game/live/63665331356

If you take the PGn from that game and give both players 800 rating I imagine the review would say something like 8-900 for me (the loser). Link above for anyone who would like to try (I think it is important people know the limitations of the 'report card'.)

pogfish3

you are not even close to 1500 ojamam dont brag with ratings youll never reach

Stay_loose_play_7deuce

I'm literally less than 50 points away and I'll almost definitely reach 1500 by the end of May, just look at my stats pogfish3.

Rayomcqueen710

I think it is that how more elo you have how better your performance rating will be but if you have a 95 accuracy game you will still have high performance