Insane games vs Cricket + AMAZING endgame thing (why is it not a brilliant move?)

Endgame thing is in game 4

The first was just Cricket playing the best moves against the Scandinavian and destroying me after I let my pawn structure get destroyed. We're not going to talk about it

Game 2:

Game 3 was won by me, I messed up in the opening (very unfamiliar Reti Gambit for me), but spotted a tactic and was able to defend an extremely pressurized position up a knight

Game 4:

Thank you for playing me @cricket7890 , I always love playing really good games against high rated players

I watched these games live lol. gg

for game three:

I mean I kinda knew that but I didn't know anything after that and the position is so uncomfortable imo for black

No I wanna see game 1... 😁

ugh fine

good games I love playing these games too, these games are so tense, also what about the other 3 games from last time... just kidding LoL!

no we wont talk about those lol

Also here is what white should do:

I agree they were not as good, we both didn't play too well

Also for that second line here is white's move:

Also next time we can have some opening test, like Réti for me and Catalan for you and we will find out which is superior

you played doo doo

c5 accomplishes less than nothing because it doesn't gain space (...b6) and it weakens all the light squares (...Be6) and is just bad, really. Qb3 is also not a great move, I intended it as filler

I see why they didn't wanna show it...

i went from beating an 1830 twice yesterday to losing 100 points in one day

generally I play 1850s...

you're also better than me lol

am I though? You know more about openings I know no theory whatsoever in my favorite...

opening = quality of play apparently