Is free-styling an opening ok?

Sort:
rook_fianchetto_37

I am sure a lot of you have probably seen Hikaru's disrespect speedrun, and while he did do a lot of trash talking, he was free-styling the opening. Of course, while it is disrespectful (as he took it to a bit of an extreme), the reason it worked is because the opponents got confused too (and they were playing a top blitz player too). But when I say free-styling an opening, I do not mean playing something random, but I mean playing an opening without learning much theory before-hand (sometimes even just knowing what the position looks like after first 5 moves!).

Playing any opening without learning much theory is still ok, as long as you try to play logical moves. Even during Hikaru's messy openings, he still got some decent positional structures (such as a "flying V" pawn structure or a "wooden shield" which is the best version of a bad Bishop). In fact, if you are free-styling any opening by playing very logical moves, then you may even be playing a lot of theory (unless it is a super sharp opening). For instance, below I had actually forgotten what to play against the first 5 moves of the London system!

And to make matters even worse, this was during an OTB standard game (1h +10s each)! Fortunately, the London system is a very positional opening so even if I made some mistakes, I wouldn't be lost or very much worse. But I was free-styling in a 1h game! 

By playing logical moves, however, I was actually playing a lot of theory and got a very pleasant position after 20 moves:

The full game (with my original annotations) is below:

While this was a very positional game, I even free-styled a gambit but stumbled on theory (as the opening I played happened to also be played by Garry Kasparov too!):

Again, I had forgotten the theory after the first 5 moves but through logical moves I had completely restricted my opponent. This was also a standard game with the same time control. In many openings, as long as you try to play with reasoning for each move, you are not going to put yourself in a lot of trouble. 

Free-styling openings also will mean that you will understand what you are doing more (and it is actually how I learned the Reti which now I always play as white), but it is definitely not better than knowing the theory. One thing I will say is if you do know the theory, you must be able to understand why you are playing it. So rather than memorising 20 moves of theory, try to understand the plans in the opening and maybe even look at a few games from Grandmasters where this opening was played for a better understanding.

But in all cases, try to play as logically as you can!

Hibyemysigh

Nice

Basically, unless you are playing a very sharp opening, you don't need to know theory

Which is why I actually don't know any theory

In any opening

At all

And somehow 1600 as one of my lowest ratings, my highest barely 1900

rook_fianchetto_37
Hibyemysigh wrote:

Nice

Basically, unless you are playing a very sharp opening, you don't need to know theory

Which is why I actually don't know any theory

In any opening

At all

And somehow 1600 as one of my lowest ratings, my highest barely 1900

Well, it is very very useful to know theory, but don't blindly memorise it: understand it too otherwise you are building a bridge but you walk of an unfinished bridge into a very fast flowing river and you have no lifeguard on because you didn't understand what you were meant to be doing

erle19

If I don't know the opening my opponent plays I always freestyle! I think it's even a sign of a good chess player to know how to play if it's not a regular game(I don't want to praise myself) because you cannot learn the whole game! So playing a free opening is good if you know how to go on and wining the game out of this situation! My opinion

Amiel_the_Chess-Cuber

Freestyling is fine, infact it leads you to a new discovery. My personal example is the Sicilian Defense, I'm always getting frustrated when i see that opening since its very complex and confusing since there are a lot of variations. But i onced found out that there was this opening I was'nt familiar (that i use it sometimes). I decided since the Sicilian Dragon is annoying i counter attack it early by the Snyder Variation by e4, c5, b2. And now since i dont know any lines over the variation I learned how to counter the Sicilian with my own lines sometimes using that opening.

VerifiedChessYarshe

I think freestyle is fine. Though u not gonna play theory and if ur opponent able to know theory against u. U wouldn't get these advantages