so clear, king can capture pawn
Is The Chess.com Analysis Wrong?

It's so clear, the king can capture the pawn. (Fix grammar errors... why do I do this)
Yeah it is!
Well for you guys its easy, but remember that I had the idea that the pawn was being protected by the bishop, so I subconsciously removed eating the pawn as a possibility.

It's not a stalemate cause pawn can be captured, also if you can't figure out why an analysis says something is best move, i recommend looking at the lines it provides under the move.
Yes O5, you're right. It took me a couple of minutes to process this. Maybe if you guys had seen the bishop attacking the pawn it would have made it more difficult for you guys.

but then when the bishop is attacking the pawn it has also left the h8 square open so it wont be a stalemate

Yes O5, you're right. It took me a couple of minutes to process this. Maybe if you guys had seen the bishop attacking the pawn it would have made it more difficult for you guys.
Welp if us were playing the game we would be confused for just a few minutes and then that's how it's not a stalemate.
Yes O5, you're right. It took me a couple of minutes to process this. Maybe if you guys had seen the bishop attacking the pawn it would have made it more difficult for you guys.
Welp if us were playing the game we would be confused for just a few minutes and then that's how it's not a stalemate.
Exactly
Today I played a game with 90.1% accuracy so I went ahead and made an analysis. I tried very hard not to make a stalemate because the enemy's king was in a tight position. I was trying to check the kin to avoid stalemate but there is this move that the analysis considers "best" that I thought was a stalemate. Can you find why this isn't stalemate? It isn't.