Congrats @sovetox, I never said white to move.
because it is always implied that only one side moves
oh well, congrats @sovetox, nice job with the... taco...
at least i found all of the mates (i obviously saw that nf2 was a thing but obviously that's not how these puzzles work)
Yes it is always just assumed, but that might not always be the case
Yes it is always just assumed, but that might not always be the case
it is always implied unless otherwise specified
since you didn't say "mates for both sides", it was just mates for one side
I said Mate in 1, I never said Mate in one for white, and seeing as it is mate in one, Nf2 would still have to count. Did I in any way specify or imply whichside is to move?
I said Mate in 1, I never said Mate in one for white, and seeing as it is mate in one, Nf2 would still have to count. Did I in any way specify or imply whichside is to move?
no, but unless it is specified that moves for both sides count, it is always just one side to play.
so yes actually, by not specifying that it was both sides moving, you specified a side.
I said Mate in 1, I never said Mate in one for white, and seeing as it is mate in one, Nf2 would still have to count. Did I in any way specify or imply whichside is to move?
no, but unless it is specified that moves for both sides count, it is always just one side to play.
so yes actually, by not specifying that it was both sides moving, you specified a side.
Let's say you are right, and I was only wanting one side. What if it is black? How do you know that?
He never specified, so he didnt say it was white
He never specified anything, so it was one side to move
I said Mate in 1, I never said Mate in one for white, and seeing as it is mate in one, Nf2 would still have to count. Did I in any way specify or imply whichside is to move?
no, but unless it is specified that moves for both sides count, it is always just one side to play.
so yes actually, by not specifying that it was both sides moving, you specified a side.
Let's say you are right, and I was only wanting one side. What if it is black? How do you know that?
we were shown white, not black
You are shown with white at the bottom, but what does that prove? Nothing. Some even play their games with the setting set so that white always on the bottom
not one, check your award, I do;t even know how much I sent
You are shown with white at the bottom, but what does that prove? Nothing. Some even play their games with the setting set so that white always on the bottom
it is generally implied that type of position would be white to move.
it is ALWAYS implied that it is ONE SIDE TO MOVE SAID OTHERWISE
you said nothing except find the mates, so i found the only relevant three
i'm fine that they "won", but it would just be nice for the puzzles to be made correctly, where we were told what we needed to know
You are shown with white at the bottom, but what does that prove? Nothing. Some even play their games with the setting set so that white always on the bottom
it is generally implied that type of position would be white to move.
it is ALWAYS implied that it is ONE SIDE TO MOVE SAID OTHERWISE
you said nothing except find the mates, so i found the only relevant three
i'm fine that they "won", but it would just be nice for the puzzles to be made correctly, where we were told what we needed to know
it is implied... by who?
You are shown with white at the bottom, but what does that prove? Nothing. Some even play their games with the setting set so that white always on the bottom
it is generally implied that type of position would be white to move.
it is ALWAYS implied that it is ONE SIDE TO MOVE SAID OTHERWISE
you said nothing except find the mates, so i found the only relevant three
i'm fine that they "won", but it would just be nice for the puzzles to be made correctly, where we were told what we needed to know
it is implied... by who?
by chess players in general
Congrats @sovetox, I never said white to move.