My lower rated opponent is playing really accurately. How do I win?

Sort:
BM_BlunderMaster90

yeah B1ZMARK but they mean they're style is similar tho his like very attacking

 

BM_BlunderMaster90

Yeah great title xD

King_of_Checkmates
chenxiaoyuer wrote:

Weird for 1600's

 

If you were faced with my situation against a 1600 playing really accurately, what would you do? I am asking you because you are a master, NM e4f5

Batman2508

rude, you ignore us, I was gonna give you swindleing tips.

HeadShotRomanTest

Sus opponent 

RLflapflap

I still consider myself low rated, so take the advice for what it's worth, but it generally works when I play against players lower rated than me.

It's annoying when I'm playing someone and can't seem to find any mistakes to exploit.  My strategy is generally: wait.  Play solid, boring moves, and keep the position complicated.  Try to play in a way where your opponent has to make complicated decisions, and you don't.  Draw out the game.  Don't trade pieces, don't make pawn breaks.  You're the higher rated player - make them come to you.  If you play in a way where playing safe is easy for you and hard for them, you can also put them in time pressure, which will make it easier for you to convert onec the mistake inevitably comes.

sndeww
RLflapflap wrote:

I still consider myself low rated, so take the advice for what it's worth, but it generally works when I play against players lower rated than me.

It's annoying when I'm playing someone and can't seem to find any mistakes to exploit.  My strategy is generally: wait.  Play solid, boring moves, and keep the position complicated.  Try to play in a way where your opponent has to make complicated decisions, and you don't.  Draw out the game.  Don't trade pieces, don't make pawn breaks.  You're the higher rated player - make them come to you.  If you play in a way where playing safe is easy for you and hard for them, you can also put them in time pressure, which will make it easier for you to convert onec the mistake inevitably comes.

Not good chess objectively, but it works wonders. We are all human.

King_of_Checkmates
qfcbv wrote:

you should think strategically; form a long term plan, which at your level, you should be able to do. look for any weaknesses in his position and exploit them. try to create the Two Weaknesses thing. don't ever play a useless move

BUT WHAT IF HE HAS NO WEAKNESSES

sndeww

Then you’re just bad ig idk 

sndeww

You’re the higher rated player. Make weaknesses.

cobb452

Throw sand in their eyes.  Always works for me

Champ1812

If you are white then I would suggest you do the Italian game. Mostly, it turns out to be a Giucoo Piano Game. Trust me, it is a really good opening because it attacks the f7 pawn. 

Batman2508
cobb452 wrote:

Throw sand in their eyes.  Always works for me

is that suppused to be a metaphor or just a liter statment?

Champ1812

I think it is supposed to be a Metaphor.

BM_BlunderMaster90
King_of_Checkmates wrote:
qfcbv wrote:

you should think strategically; form a long term plan, which at your level, you should be able to do. look for any weaknesses in his position and exploit them. try to create the Two Weaknesses thing. don't ever play a useless move

BUT WHAT IF HE HAS NO WEAKNESSES

If you really want to win you must drag him over the abyss. If you are higher rated you are probably better at tactics so get a game that stands on the edge of a knife. Also your opponents could just be underrated.

Batman2508
qfcbv wrote:
TheChessKid90 wrote:
King_of_Checkmates wrote:
qfcbv wrote:

you should think strategically; form a long term plan, which at your level, you should be able to do. look for any weaknesses in his position and exploit them. try to create the Two Weaknesses thing. don't ever play a useless move

BUT WHAT IF HE HAS NO WEAKNESSES

If you really want to win you must drag him over the abyss. If you are higher rated you are probably better at tactics so get a game that stands on the edge of a knife. Also your opponents could just be underrated....

.... which means that they don't shoot two bats with one arrow as often

can we stop wih the metaphors, I dont understand anyoen of them, Im just a girl in 5th grade.

BM_BlunderMaster90
Batman2508 wrote:
qfcbv wrote:
TheChessKid90 wrote:
King_of_Checkmates wrote:
qfcbv wrote:

you should think strategically; form a long term plan, which at your level, you should be able to do. look for any weaknesses in his position and exploit them. try to create the Two Weaknesses thing. don't ever play a useless move

BUT WHAT IF HE HAS NO WEAKNESSES

If you really want to win you must drag him over the abyss. If you are higher rated you are probably better at tactics so get a game that stands on the edge of a knife. Also your opponents could just be underrated....

.... which means that they don't shoot two bats with one arrow as often

can we stop wih the metaphors, I dont understand anyoen of them, Im just a girl in 5th grade.

yeah I hear you. I get what it is supposed to mean but it doesn't make sense here.

King_of_Checkmates
cobb452 wrote:

Throw sand in their eyes.  Always works for me

Do that if he's a cheater and anyone named Cheatum or Swindle.

Ivangupta

I suggest you play calm and try not to make errors 

Ivangupta
josephyossi wrote:

just resign

 

No reasonable player will do that