All of this is definitely necessary
my view of how to restrict prearrangment-team-like phenomena
Sort:
Feb 28, 2024
0
#3
Really not seeing examples of actual cheating going on, and the grammar just blurs whatever point you were trying to make afterwards...
right now i`ve seen many phenomena like it,especially one sent a queen but others don`t have it and kept it safe.I offer a piece of suggestion here.
my suggesion is to input rule of cheskers"you must have chessmen,and you must have the most valuable one"in sone situations,in order to prevent these teammative men.
said the rule:
1.one must have a chessnan with not suppose.
2.when youe chessman can have at least 2 others`chessmen withoue suppose,no matter whose,whether they are protected,you must have the most valuable one(you may not do it when the mosy valuable chessmen is the same value as yours,but you must have the next one in value.,you can also use bishop to have rook.)
3.when you have two+ chessmen attacking chessmen,you must use your most unvaluable one tu have the most valuable one.
4.checkmate is higher than other having.having king and checkmate will be seen as the same.player must do it.
5.in my advice,when red moved,others cannot sacrifice chessmen to threaten red except green,and it is unallowed that players have red`s chessmen together without a check.
is it necessary?please talk.