In lieu of our founder Comrade Trotzky's absense, I suggest to attempt a more revolutionarized attempt of governance, the member councils.
I have found these positions able to be filled by different assemblies.
1. in charge of games creation (votechess/matches)
2. in charge of invitations (text, spreading knowledge)
3. in charge of designs (pictures, text)
4. in charge of fairness and professionalism (of discussions)
*
The voting process is as follows:
1. there is a one day time to accept suggestions of people you consider fit for the job.
2. There is a two day gap to vote for the participants. Do not vote yourself.
3. The council is made by everyone. Each has a voted 'capital' equaling the number of votes recieved plus the standard deviation* of the votes.
4. Each proposal needs the number of two times the standard deviation vote to be put into motion. Capital disappears when used.
(= 2 people with no votes)
5. New elections once two weeks pass or when all capital is spent.
6. Each proposal can be overruled by four times the standard deviation.
(=4 people with no votes)
* Standard deviation = (✓[sum(votes-ø)²]) If a comma number, this will be rounded to the next larger number.
Ok
The obvious benefit is that each office can only be occupied as long as the voters agree. If the person for games creation create too many games, one can oust him next run.
i do agree with such a system tho there does need to be checks and balences
In lieu of our founder Comrade Trotzky's absense, I suggest to attempt a more revolutionarized attempt of governance, the member councils.
I have found these positions able to be filled by different assemblies.
1. in charge of games creation (votechess/matches)
2. in charge of invitations (text, spreading knowledge)
3. in charge of designs (pictures, text)
4. in charge of fairness and professionalism (of discussions)
*
*
The voting process is as follows:
1. there is a one day time to accept suggestions of people you consider fit for the job.
2. There is a two day gap to vote for the participants. Do not vote yourself.
3. The council is made by everyone. Each has a voted 'capital' equaling the number of votes recieved plus the standard deviation* of the votes.
4. Each proposal needs the number of two times the standard deviation vote to be put into motion. Capital disappears when used.
(= 2 people with no votes)
5. New elections once two weeks pass or when all capital is spent.
6. Each proposal can be overruled by four times the standard deviation.
(=4 people with no votes)
* Standard deviation = (✓[sum(votes-ø)²]) If a comma number, this will be rounded to the next larger number.