Poll: What rating System for FFA would you prefer?

Sort:
At_d0sA_fNLt_Laris

actually +5 -1.1 -1.1 -2.8

seems like a better solution 

LosChess
empty_K3 wrote:

It does not matter if it's +3 or +4 because you can adjust the elo factor to make it the same again. The numbers should only symbolize the relative difference between the placements.

I think the difference between 2nd and 3rd should be smaller than between 3rd and 4th this is why I don't Like +3 -0.5 - 1 -1.5 that much.

But maybe in between +3,5 - 0,5 -1 -2 is fine.
(or scaled to whole numbers: +7 -1 - 2 -4)

Yeah this is what I was going for, and makes the most sense.

+3.5 -0.5 -1 -2

rupkayak

Can we finally implement something and delete solo?

Radon

Well I demand that the community is actually heard and you offer back up the old ffa scoring system at least alongside SFA then let us choose. Honestly it is appalling at this point.

DoubleSpeedRocks
empty_K3 wrote:

What would be the Best Rating System for FFA?

The Options we know are:
Solo +3 -1 -1 -1
FFA +3 +1 -1 -3
High FFA +3 0 0 -3

And @Radon and I both suggested a further Option:
Radon +4 -1 -1 -2
Empty +4 0 -1 -3

What do you think is best?
Do you have other Ideas?

Let me know!
Cheers Michael

I have a novel concept. Why not leave it like it is ? Just explain it in simple English ( or the language you use )  so the rest of us can understand it. 

AaronSmile

What about +6 -1 -2 -3???

AaronSmile

Or +10 -2 -3 -5?