Yeah, lots of people agree with me. lol
Question to all 4pc lovers!
Sort:
Feb 8, 2021
0
#23
Amisoka wrote:
I met many nice friends, like aparna, elsa, legend, roger, aso, aso and we had many rewarding and fun chats for which I am very grateful. Making new friends is on of the most beautiful and precious things in my life
Awww Thank you soo much Amisoka 
you are the best. I wish to see you back at 4pc hope you will get back soon and yet we enjoy some more funny games 
Again Thanks for your precious Feeling about me .... i know about your work load goodluck for that and cya soon..
I am? (Happy Dance) lol
TheChessDude991 wrote:
4PC is really fun, tactical, and much more strategic than 2PC. It has improved my 2PC and has helped many people through these hard times.
IMO 2pc is probably much more strategic, since long term positional ideas are relevant in 2pc in a way that they often aren't in 4pc. 4pc seems much more tactical to me though, since there are constantly dangerous tactics and threats to be aware of
Hailey_97 wrote:
TheChessDude991 wrote:
4PC is really fun, tactical, and much more strategic than 2PC. It has improved my 2PC and has helped many people through these hard times.
IMO 2pc is probably much more strategic, since long term positional ideas are relevant in 2pc in a way that they often aren't in 4pc. 4pc seems much more tactical to me though, since there are constantly dangerous tactics and threats to be aware of
I know what you mean- and this is often brought up- the idea that a move has less consequence in 4pc than in 2pc. Ie, if you have a backward pawn in a 4pc game and someone is pressuring it, that can change based on the movements of other players (and it can't in 2pc). However, your position in 4pc can also be exploited because of tiny, tiny weaknesses (say you pushed a pawn a bit too far, and now your dark squares are weak- all it takes in one person to notice that and once he sees and attacks you, others will join in.
I guess 2pc is more strategic, it depends on your definition of strategic compared to tactics
2pc more strategic?
Never!
I think most to all of us can agree that 4PC FFA is the most complex (strategic) mode of chess available at the moment, hands-down. That's because there's 3 opponents. And, even in 4PC teams, which is more tactical, there's still a lot of strategy on things like how to preserve the better position, pieces, get in a better endgame, etc. Basically, double the pieces, more than double the possibilities.
May 18, 2021
0
#32
lol, in 4pc there are the five main excuses people make when they don't win:
1. LAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAG
2. bruh, you teamers
3. My opposite wasn't cooperating
4. I slipped. 
5. (Insert your excuse here)
In 2pc, there really is only 1. Slip and 2. Lag. There is no teaming or opposite or whatever.
May 18, 2021
0
#33
there is also the excuse that your opponent cheated and en passanted Xd
I do like 4PC cuz I can have fun and improves 2 player chess, but Team games wait for so long
and almost every time I play FFA or Solo, two of all three other players will team up and take me down! To be honest, I do play a lot, but not like it so much.
I agree with mayim
same