Response to'Response to'Response to'Another noob, in my block list, entered to anonymous FFA game

 Vibgyor2 wrote: Play-banned wrote: "Blocking doesn't work for anonymous, but in anonymous you don't know who your opponents are so there's no point in blocking. I would say that it remains this way otherwise people will block pros on purpose so that only noobs will be in the anonymous game, and it makes rating farms easier. Btw I got blocked by the user, come on why! This means I can't post on that thread so I have to create a new thread. We should make blocking not affect posting on the blocking user's thread"

The problem is not that a player may not target/throw on you. The point is that I don't want any noobs who're in my blocklist. Say for example this game :- " https://www.chess.com/variants/4-player-chess/game/32899114/82/1 " that dude threw like anything for no reason...and that might be the key reason for him to get into my blocklist at 1st place! And the thing you told later that "rating inflation" and high rated players inflating without getting high competition...that's completely baseless and senseless    

I get that there are going to be noobs in your blocklist who you don't want in your games. They can be annoying indeed. Maybe make it so that 2 people who are already in the game have to be blocking that specific user for him to not be able to join that anonymous game. That makes sure that its a well-known noob and not 1 player blocking every pro there that no one else has blocked. 

I get that its getting ridiculous about me responding to another thread in this way, I apologise, I have to do it this way if a person has blocked me. I know that its 3 responses in a row. Sorry admins, but I feel like this thread will become locked/deleted even.

who cares 

I CARE!

OH THE DRAMA UNROLLING! I NEED TO SEE IT THROUGH! WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT?!😍😍😍

So if I block magnito, I win worlds, makes sense.

btw, in my blocklist there's a special space called blacklist where I put players I don't want to face at all costs, in my games. It's similar to "1st  place on my blocklist" thing mentioned earlier in previous posts. So...I usually play public games since the anonymous games are a gathering of the most blocked players on the server, one really horrible toxic place, terrible skill, filled with players who're throwing on purpose etc. Since public game queues never actually start due to "someone (already in the queue) blocked someone" you might be forced to join anonymous queue, but still it's your choice... You don't have to... Not to mention, those you block can make a new account and still mess your rating up by smurfing...

Please stop creating new threads about this. You can keep it contained in the two that are already there, or just unblock each other until this conversation is over.