u need to designate a max number of members coz if not then small teams like mine wil be crushed stone dead by those that have 300 members
Rules of the Chess.com TM CHAMPIONSHIP

Sometimes it's not important the members number but the average rate....or other reasons...don't think that your team have to lose against other group because simply the number...

Tie-break is maybe better defined by match ratio , instead of scoring difference, because the teams are not obliged to have the same number of players in each match. For instance Team A may loose from Team B with 23:13, and from Team C with 17:9 . The Team C will be in worse position, only because Team A participated with less players in their match. I guess you understand what I mean :-))

Tie-break is maybe better defined by match ratio , instead of scoring difference, because the teams are not obliged to have the same number of players in each match. For instance Team A may loose from Team B with 23:13, and from Team C with 17:9 . The Team C will be in worse position, only because Team A participated with less players in their match. I guess you understand what I mean :-))
It is a good idea...I will think about it... and posibly I will include in the rules...

I'm really looking forward to this!
So am I!
By the way, how many members are there in each team match?
OG

During the current Round 1, does each team have to play all thier opponents at the same time or one by one?

During the current Round 1, does each team have to play all thier opponents at the same time or one by one?
One by one, according to the schedule reflected on the pairings board

During the current Round 1, does each team have to play all thier opponents at the same time or one by one?
One by one, according to the schedule reflected on the pairings board
Well, The biggest chess group ever has already started all the matches (a few hours ago). Was it against the rules then?

During the current Round 1, does each team have to play all thier opponents at the same time or one by one?
One by one, according to the schedule reflected on the pairings board
Well, The biggest chess group ever has already started all the matches (a few hours ago). Was it against the rules then?
No, the rules specify deadline dates... you can start earlier if both groups are ready... :)

My group is playing with group x that has not locked thier rosters for a bit more than 5 days...my group has locked thiers 2 days ago but group x has still not locked thiers..what am I suppose to do now??? I read that it is a rule to lock a team's roster before 5 days.

My group is playing with group x that has not locked thier rosters for a bit more than 5 days...my group has locked thiers 2 days ago but group x has still not locked thiers..what am I suppose to do now??? I read that it is a rule to lock a team's roster before 5 days.
Yes, there are 5 days to lock but bear in mind that it is taking the pairing board date... so if you are talking about a TM challenge already issued your opponent is not forced to lock it until next 25th... yes, I know it is a long time... but from my experience I have to give that period of time to ensure the championship runs smoothly... try to talk with your opponent leader, I am sure that he/she will lock earlier if you both are ready.
THESE RULES ARE THE VERSION 1 AND SOME ARTICLES MIGHT CHANGE BEFORE THE LEAGUE STARTS. CHECK THIS TOPIC PRERIODICALLY!
(LEAGUE WILL START OFFICIALLY NEXT MAY 15th, after this no changes are allowed)
-"TMC ROUND #:TEAM A vs TEAM B -" NO rating limit / 5-∞ players / 2 concurrent games / autostart off / 3 days move