Solution to people teaming up you

Sort:
Ljuma

If a player is thrown in check then that means they cannot be thrown in check by an other player until their out of check.

Legend_7112

What? I'm sorry but I didn't understand... I'm only 1900 rated...

sapianguy

ur 1750...

Persavosh

I didn't understand what you mean. I think you mean a player can not be checked by 2 players at the same time; If this is what you mean, it is possible and the player needs to solve both checks (they can not capture one of checking pieces and/or block only one)

SilvaFernando1995

Yo creo que inicialmente en 4PC FFA se hace una colaboración indirecta entre opuestos para eliminar a un lateral... quedando solo 3 jugadores... creo que debes intuir las intenciones de tu opuesto de atacar al lateral derecho o izquierdo y tu tratar de sacar provecho de eso haciendo una pequeña "colaboración", lo cual debilita a uno de ellos hasta posiblemente darle mate con mayor facilidad, lo que asegura que al menos no salgas de primero muerto...!!! mas que hacer equipo entre ellos, se basa en coordinar una estrategia en el tablero para quitarte poder. Por lo tanto tienes que estar mas preocupado de los posibles ataques de tus laterales antes que de tu opuesto. Pues resulta mas conveniente para un jugador lidiar con 2 adversarios que trataran de balancear el juego para lograr conseguir la mayor cantidad de puntos, que con 3 al mismo tiempo. Me ha pasado muchas veces tu situación, pero analizándolo detenidamente, lo he llegado a ver como una estrategia, se trata mas bien de un estilo de juego, recuerda que cada jugador elige su estrategia.

Arbunckle

um, go play 2pc if you dont like 4pc. dont ruin the game. part of whats so fun about 4pc is the strategy is a lot more complex. also teams would literally not work that way.

sapianguy
SilvaFernando1995 wrote:

Yo creo que inicialmente en 4PC FFA se hace una colaboración indirecta entre opuestos para eliminar a un lateral... quedando solo 3 jugadores... creo que debes intuir las intenciones de tu opuesto de atacar al lateral derecho o izquierdo y tu tratar de sacar provecho de eso haciendo una pequeña "colaboración", lo cual debilita a uno de ellos hasta posiblemente darle mate con mayor facilidad, lo que asegura que al menos no salgas de primero muerto...!!! mas que hacer equipo entre ellos, se basa en coordinar una estrategia en el tablero para quitarte poder. Por lo tanto tienes que estar mas preocupado de los posibles ataques de tus laterales antes que de tu opuesto. Pues resulta mas conveniente para un jugador lidiar con 2 adversarios que trataran de balancear el juego para lograr conseguir la mayor cantidad de puntos, que con 3 al mismo tiempo. Me ha pasado muchas veces tu situación, pero analizándolo detenidamente, lo he llegado a ver como una estrategia, se trata mas bien de un estilo de juego, recuerda que cada jugador elige su estrategia.

for people who dont understand spanish
I think that initially in 4PC FFA there is an indirect collaboration between opposites to eliminate a winger... leaving only 3 players... I think you should intuit the intentions of your opponent to attack the right or left winger and you try to take out Take advantage of that by doing a little "collaboration", which weakens one of them to possibly mate more easily, which ensures that at least you don't come out dead first...!!! More than making a team between them, it is based on coordinating a strategy on the board to take power away from you. Therefore you have to be more concerned about possible attacks from your wingers than from your opponent. Well, it is more convenient for a player to deal with 2 opponents who will try to balance the game to get the most points, than with 3 at the same time. Your situation has happened to me many times, but analyzing it carefully, I have come to see it as a strategy, it is more of a style of play, remember that each player chooses his strategy.

Indipendenza

Well, nothing to comment about really. The reality is that you may be attacked by 0, 1, 2 or even 3 players in the same time. It is the very essence of the 4p chess, and if you don't like it, you should stick to classical 2p chess. (To implement any rule about it would ruin totally the game, it can't even be imagined).

chesswhizz9

The solution is simple! Stop and play teams/self-partner.

MeatHammer007

I have a great solution to your problem of other "teaming up on you" in 4PC- put your king away early and don't get checked! Problem solved.

If you get attacked because you are in check- that is because you allowed yourself to be checked and you are now the weak meat fresh for the taking. Someone has to go down first. Don't whine if you don't play well.

Sorry for you and your feelings.

Persavosh
MeatHammer007 wrote:

I have a great solution to your problem of other "teaming up on you" in 4PC- put your king away early and don't get checked! Problem solved.

If you get attacked because you are in check- that is because you allowed yourself to be checked and you are now the weak meat fresh for the taking. Someone has to go down first. Don't whine if you don't play well.

Sorry for you and your feelings.

A 1550-1600 rating solution.

I don't know why and how you say that's brilliant and great solution.

Arjun1516

I don't get it sad.png