I really don't know why people don't like new Standard...
It is the faires of all setups. Same starting position for each color same chances for each color.
I also don't get what people mean by "New Standard is boring"... What do you mean? Are the games always the same? How? After the short teaming phase in the Opening it is Solo and Solo games are never the same and never boring.
And even the Opening isn't always the same. Because I play a different one, and I am #5 on the leaderboard. So there are other Openings possible. You can be forced into the Standard Opening if you are green, but your options are always more limited if you are the last moving player. It is even worse in Old Standard.
Maybe Omatomix is not right for Teams, I can't talk about that, because I don't know much about teams. But it is for sure the better Setup for FFA and Solo.
I think that a lot of players who are crying about New Standard are more affected by the rating change than by the new setup. Because in FFA your primary goal is to be not 4th and only your secondary goal is to be 1st. In solo only winning counts. People who played perfect teams opening, mate a player, and then go "whatever, some I win some I lose" are basically out of high elo FFA. Both strategies do not work anymore. They need new teams strats because the setup changed and also being good in teams does not mean anything in FFA anymore. And those players (or noble gases) are mad now because all they've learned over the last years is worth nothing now.
I profit from both changes because I have been a solo player ever since, and also my playstyle (King security: always castle to the right) is easier to play in Omatomix. So probably my Opinion is heavily biased.
But I don't want Omatomix because it's better for me, I want it because it is objectively the better setup. And I feel strengthened in my opinion by @neoserbian because he is one of those players like me who has always been around and always been on the top. And @neoserbian, reigning world Champ Lars and I are the only 3 players who have played all 3 solo world championships. I don't know what Lars' opinion on this topic is, but It should give you something to think about if 2 of the 3 players with the most high elo experience in the world are very strongly for Omatomix.
Cheers Michael
I can't speak that much about FFA/Solo, but do you really regard it as true that it is harder for green in the old setup? The game for green can be virtually over if blue makes one or two passive moves in the new setup (i.e. 1.h3 Nc6 i12 k11 2. Bg3 d11 g12 l8 3.f3 d4 Bxl8...)
I really don't know why people don't like new Standard...
It is the faires of all setups. Same starting position for each color same chances for each color.
I also don't get what people mean by "New Standard is boring"... What do you mean? Are the games always the same? How? After the short teaming phase in the Opening it is Solo and Solo games are never the same and never boring.
And even the Opening isn't always the same. Because I play a different one, and I am #5 on the leaderboard. So there are other Openings possible. You can be forced into the Standard Opening if you are green, but your options are always more limited if you are the last moving player. It is even worse in Old Standard.
Maybe Omatomix is not right for Teams, I can't talk about that, because I don't know much about teams. But it is for sure the better Setup for FFA and Solo.
I think that a lot of players who are crying about New Standard are more affected by the rating change than by the new setup. Because in FFA your primary goal is to be not 4th and only your secondary goal is to be 1st. In solo only winning counts. People who played perfect teams opening, mate a player, and then go "whatever, some I win some I lose" are basically out of high elo FFA. Both strategies do not work anymore. They need new teams strats because the setup changed and also being good in teams does not mean anything in FFA anymore. And those players (or noble gases) are mad now because all they've learned over the last years is worth nothing now.
I profit from both changes because I have been a solo player ever since, and also my playstyle (King security: always castle to the right) is easier to play in Omatomix. So probably my Opinion is heavily biased.
But I don't want Omatomix because it's better for me, I want it because it is objectively the better setup. And I feel strengthened in my opinion by @neoserbian because he is one of those players like me who has always been around and always been on the top. And @neoserbian, reigning world Champ Lars and I are the only 3 players who have played all 3 solo world championships. I don't know what Lars' opinion on this topic is, but It should give you something to think about if 2 of the 3 players with the most high elo experience in the world are very strongly for Omatomix.
Cheers Michael
Good joke. Lars is the only expert of the 3 of you and he hates the set up. I also love how you think my teams knowledge is how I got my rating when any other actual top player knows my teams is by far the weakest and that all my success comes from the 3 player stage but you wouldn't understand because you stick to one narrative and never shift away despite all the evidence pointing towards it.
@neoserbian is a great player and nice guy who I respect but please don't kid and think you are even close to players like myself, let alone Lars or Rojitto (who also hates the set up).
You also think that FFA ≠ Solo for some reason which just goes to show you why you do not understand the thought process of the top players. We do not play for "not 4th then 1st", we play for 1st from the get go.