Starting Position Reverted to OLD

Sort:
Avatar of Radon
empty_K3 wrote:

I really don't know why people don't like new Standard...
It is the faires of all setups. Same starting position for each color same chances for each color.

I also don't get what people mean by "New Standard is boring"... What do you mean? Are the games always the same? How? After the short teaming phase in the Opening it is Solo and Solo games are never the same and never boring.
And even the Opening isn't always the same. Because I play a different one, and I am #5 on the leaderboard. So there are other Openings possible. You can be forced into the Standard Opening if you are green, but your options are always more limited if you are the last moving player. It is even worse in Old Standard.

Maybe Omatomix is not right for Teams, I can't talk about that, because I don't know much about teams. But it is for sure the better Setup for FFA and Solo.

I think that a lot of players who are crying about New Standard are more affected by the rating change than by the new setup. Because in FFA your primary goal is to be not 4th and only your secondary goal is to be 1st. In solo only winning counts. People who played perfect teams opening, mate a player, and then go "whatever, some I win some I lose" are basically out of high elo FFA. Both strategies do not work anymore. They need new teams strats because the setup changed and also being good in teams does not mean anything in FFA anymore. And those players (or noble gases) are mad now because all they've learned over the last years is worth nothing now.

I profit from both changes because I have been a solo player ever since, and also my playstyle (King security: always castle to the right) is easier to play in Omatomix. So probably my Opinion is heavily biased.

But I don't want Omatomix because it's better for me, I want it because it is objectively the better setup. And I feel strengthened in my opinion by @neoserbian because he is one of those players like me who has always been around and always been on the top. And @neoserbian, reigning world Champ Lars and I are the only 3 players who have played all 3 solo world championships. I don't know what Lars' opinion on this topic is, but It should give you something to think about if 2 of the 3 players with the most high elo experience in the world are very strongly for Omatomix.

Cheers Michael

 

Good joke. Lars is the only expert of the 3 of you and he hates the set up. I also love how you think my teams knowledge is how I got my rating when any other actual top player knows my teams is by far the weakest and that all my success comes from the 3 player stage but you wouldn't understand because you stick to one narrative and never shift away despite all the evidence pointing towards it. 

@neoserbian is a great player and nice guy who I respect but please don't kid and think you are even close to players like myself, let alone Lars or Rojitto (who also hates the set up). 

 

You also think that FFA ≠ Solo for some reason which just goes to show you why you do not understand the thought process of the top players. We do not play for "not 4th then 1st", we play for 1st from the get go. 

Avatar of LazyImp
empty_K3 wrote:

I really don't know why people don't like new Standard...
It is the faires of all setups. Same starting position for each color same chances for each color.

I also don't get what people mean by "New Standard is boring"... What do you mean? Are the games always the same? How? After the short teaming phase in the Opening it is Solo and Solo games are never the same and never boring.
And even the Opening isn't always the same. Because I play a different one, and I am #5 on the leaderboard. So there are other Openings possible. You can be forced into the Standard Opening if you are green, but your options are always more limited if you are the last moving player. It is even worse in Old Standard.

Maybe Omatomix is not right for Teams, I can't talk about that, because I don't know much about teams. But it is for sure the better Setup for FFA and Solo.

I think that a lot of players who are crying about New Standard are more affected by the rating change than by the new setup. Because in FFA your primary goal is to be not 4th and only your secondary goal is to be 1st. In solo only winning counts. People who played perfect teams opening, mate a player, and then go "whatever, some I win some I lose" are basically out of high elo FFA. Both strategies do not work anymore. They need new teams strats because the setup changed and also being good in teams does not mean anything in FFA anymore. And those players (or noble gases) are mad now because all they've learned over the last years is worth nothing now.

I profit from both changes because I have been a solo player ever since, and also my playstyle (King security: always castle to the right) is easier to play in Omatomix. So probably my Opinion is heavily biased.

But I don't want Omatomix because it's better for me, I want it because it is objectively the better setup. And I feel strengthened in my opinion by @neoserbian because he is one of those players like me who has always been around and always been on the top. And @neoserbian, reigning world Champ Lars and I are the only 3 players who have played all 3 solo world championships. I don't know what Lars' opinion on this topic is, but It should give you something to think about if 2 of the 3 players with the most high elo experience in the world are very strongly for Omatomix.

Cheers Michael

 I can't speak that much about FFA/Solo, but do you really regard it as true that it is harder for green in the old setup? The game for green can be virtually over if blue makes one or two passive moves in the new setup (i.e. 1.h3 Nc6 i12 k11 2. Bg3 d11 g12 l8 3.f3 d4 Bxl8...)

Avatar of LazyImp
JustinD7 wrote:

The old standard positron is the same boring opening everytime. After 10 moves the position looks the same in every game. With omatamix there is variation in the opening, red can open with a couple of other moves other than Kings pawn and there are even more options for the other colours. There is a problem with omatamix in that green is basically lost by force on the opening if blue does not help, but this is similar with the old setup and is more of a problem of the scoring system. Opposites must have an incentive to help each at a high level in FFA and that is to return to the old old scoring system of 2 winners and keep solo as a 2nd option.

There are a group of players who like the team mode openings and are on twitch a lot, who have quite loud voices on the forum and probably behind the scenes too. Of course if there is a vote its going to be biased, because the players happily playing omatamix are probably not looking at the forum and voting. They are playing instead!

What I hate most about the old setup is the lack of options for red. If you don't want to force team mode openings on to the game and want to start with something slower more solo like, what do you play? Any other move than h3 gives blue and green the chance to play h3 King pawn themselves and attack you, giving them the advantage. If you prepare for this and play Queens Pawn forward one square and they don't bring queen out well you just waste a move because this pawn wants to go forward, and if you play Queen pawn forward 2 and they bring the queen's out you have weakened the dark squares to much. If you push the C pawn sicilian this move is just bad vs certain lines of team mode attack. And bringing either knight out just gets attacked by rook pawn. There are no good moves for red in old setup other than h3. Which forces team mode openings and it goes round in circles until by move 15 it's the same position in every game. In omatamix red can basically play anything because they have 2 methods to play team mode openings and bring the Queen out. With h3 or with the C pawn. So red does not need to force team mode openings but can meet them easily if b/G try to force it. This is why I prefer omatamix over old setup but brsti does look interesting I have not looked at it yet though

Oh no, the person who gets to move first still has to play around everyone else's possibilities...

Also, there are plenty of viable non-h3 openings.

Avatar of LazyImp
JustinD7 wrote:
LazyImp wrote:
JustinD7 wrote:

The old standard positron is the same boring opening everytime. After 10 moves the position looks the same in every game. With omatamix there is variation in the opening, red can open with a couple of other moves other than Kings pawn and there are even more options for the other colours. There is a problem with omatamix in that green is basically lost by force on the opening if blue does not help, but this is similar with the old setup and is more of a problem of the scoring system. Opposites must have an incentive to help each at a high level in FFA and that is to return to the old old scoring system of 2 winners and keep solo as a 2nd option.

There are a group of players who like the team mode openings and are on twitch a lot, who have quite loud voices on the forum and probably behind the scenes too. Of course if there is a vote its going to be biased, because the players happily playing omatamix are probably not looking at the forum and voting. They are playing instead!

What I hate most about the old setup is the lack of options for red. If you don't want to force team mode openings on to the game and want to start with something slower more solo like, what do you play? Any other move than h3 gives blue and green the chance to play h3 King pawn themselves and attack you, giving them the advantage. If you prepare for this and play Queens Pawn forward one square and they don't bring queen out well you just waste a move because this pawn wants to go forward, and if you play Queen pawn forward 2 and they bring the queen's out you have weakened the dark squares to much. If you push the C pawn sicilian this move is just bad vs certain lines of team mode attack. And bringing either knight out just gets attacked by rook pawn. There are no good moves for red in old setup other than h3. Which forces team mode openings and it goes round in circles until by move 15 it's the same position in every game. In omatamix red can basically play anything because they have 2 methods to play team mode openings and bring the Queen out. With h3 or with the C pawn. So red does not need to force team mode openings but can meet them easily if b/G try to force it. This is why I prefer omatamix over old setup but brsti does look interesting I have not looked at it yet though

Oh no, the person who gets to move first still has to play around everyone else's possibilities...

Also, there are plenty of viable non-h3 openings.

I actually thought u would respond didn't think that quickly though. You can do better. You need to back up your statements with explanations otherwise the statements have no validity. 

What are you confused about? I stated very clearly there are viable non-h3 openings.  Any opening setup you choose will have some downside, and you should expect your opponents to play to your setup's weaknesses.  g3, g4, h3, h4, Nf3, Ni3, f3, f4 are all playable.  I think the real issue here is you see one problem and rather than play around it you just label a setup bad.  For example, take g4.  You state that if blue plays c8 and brings queens out this is bad because "you have weakened the dark squares too much."  You could try moves like Nf3, which help cover h2, or you could even fight for the dark squares yourself with moves like Ni3 and a later h3/h4.  This is all situational, obviously, and h3 will probably remain the most popular for a number of reasons, yet there are other options  you write off too quickly.

Avatar of LazyImp
JustinD7 wrote:
LazyImp wrote:
JustinD7 wrote:
LazyImp wrote:
JustinD7 wrote:

The old standard positron is the same boring opening everytime. After 10 moves the position looks the same in every game. With omatamix there is variation in the opening, red can open with a couple of other moves other than Kings pawn and there are even more options for the other colours. There is a problem with omatamix in that green is basically lost by force on the opening if blue does not help, but this is similar with the old setup and is more of a problem of the scoring system. Opposites must have an incentive to help each at a high level in FFA and that is to return to the old old scoring system of 2 winners and keep solo as a 2nd option.

There are a group of players who like the team mode openings and are on twitch a lot, who have quite loud voices on the forum and probably behind the scenes too. Of course if there is a vote its going to be biased, because the players happily playing omatamix are probably not looking at the forum and voting. They are playing instead!

What I hate most about the old setup is the lack of options for red. If you don't want to force team mode openings on to the game and want to start with something slower more solo like, what do you play? Any other move than h3 gives blue and green the chance to play h3 King pawn themselves and attack you, giving them the advantage. If you prepare for this and play Queens Pawn forward one square and they don't bring queen out well you just waste a move because this pawn wants to go forward, and if you play Queen pawn forward 2 and they bring the queen's out you have weakened the dark squares to much. If you push the C pawn sicilian this move is just bad vs certain lines of team mode attack. And bringing either knight out just gets attacked by rook pawn. There are no good moves for red in old setup other than h3. Which forces team mode openings and it goes round in circles until by move 15 it's the same position in every game. In omatamix red can basically play anything because they have 2 methods to play team mode openings and bring the Queen out. With h3 or with the C pawn. So red does not need to force team mode openings but can meet them easily if b/G try to force it. This is why I prefer omatamix over old setup but brsti does look interesting I have not looked at it yet though

Oh no, the person who gets to move first still has to play around everyone else's possibilities...

Also, there are plenty of viable non-h3 openings.

I actually thought u would respond didn't think that quickly though. You can do better. You need to back up your statements with explanations otherwise the statements have no validity. 

What are you confused about? I stated very clearly there are viable non-h3 openings.  Any opening setup you choose will have some downside, and you should expect your opponents to play to your setup's weaknesses.  g3, g4, h3, h4, Nf3, Ni3, f3, f4 are all playable.  I think the real issue here is you see one problem and rather than play around it you just label a setup bad.  For example, take g4.  You state that if blue plays c8 and brings queens out this is bad because "you have weakened the dark squares too much."  You could try moves like Nf3, which help cover h2, or you could even fight for the dark squares yourself with moves like Ni3 and a later h3/h4.  This is all situational, obviously, and h3 will probably remain the most popular for a number of reasons, yet there are other options  you write off too quickly.

And have you played any of these openings on your journey to 2950. No you have not. So shhhh

Did I ever say I had?  I vastly prefer h3, yet this doesn't mean everything else is awful and unviable.

Avatar of ProfBlundermaster
JustinD7 wrote:

The old standard positron is the same boring opening everytime. After 10 moves the position looks the same in every game. With omatamix there is variation in the opening, red can open with a couple of other moves other than Kings pawn and there are even more options for the other colours. There is a problem with omatamix in that green is basically lost by force on the opening if blue does not help, but this is similar with the old setup and is more of a problem of the scoring system. Opposites must have an incentive to help each at a high level in FFA and that is to return to the old old scoring system of 2 winners and keep solo as a 2nd option.

There are a group of players who like the team mode openings and are on twitch a lot, who have quite loud voices on the forum and probably behind the scenes too. Of course if there is a vote its going to be biased, because the players happily playing omatamix are probably not looking at the forum and voting. They are playing instead!

What I hate most about the old setup is the lack of options for red. If you don't want to force team mode openings on to the game and want to start with something slower more solo like, what do you play? Any other move than h3 gives blue and green the chance to play h3 King pawn themselves and attack you, giving them the advantage. If you prepare for this and play Queens Pawn forward one square and they don't bring queen out well you just waste a move because this pawn wants to go forward and push for promotion in a slower game, and if you play Queen pawn forward 2 and they bring the queen's out you have weakened the dark squares to much. If you push the C pawn sicilian this move is just bad vs certain lines of team mode attack. And bringing either knight out just gets attacked by rook pawn. There are no good moves for red in old setup other than h3. Which forces team mode openings and it goes round in circles until by move 15 it's the same position in every game. In omatamix red can basically play anything because they have 2 methods to play team mode openings and bring the Queen out. With h3 or with the C pawn. So red does not need to force team mode openings but can meet them easily if b/G try to force it. This is why I prefer omatamix over old setup but brsti does look interesting I have not looked at it yet though

 

Justin, I have read what you have written, and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. If you are smoking something extraordinary and see bright neon lights, please remember that sharing is caring.

Avatar of LazyImp
ProfBlundermaster wrote:
JustinD7 wrote:

The old standard positron is the same boring opening everytime. After 10 moves the position looks the same in every game. With omatamix there is variation in the opening, red can open with a couple of other moves other than Kings pawn and there are even more options for the other colours. There is a problem with omatamix in that green is basically lost by force on the opening if blue does not help, but this is similar with the old setup and is more of a problem of the scoring system. Opposites must have an incentive to help each at a high level in FFA and that is to return to the old old scoring system of 2 winners and keep solo as a 2nd option.

There are a group of players who like the team mode openings and are on twitch a lot, who have quite loud voices on the forum and probably behind the scenes too. Of course if there is a vote its going to be biased, because the players happily playing omatamix are probably not looking at the forum and voting. They are playing instead!

What I hate most about the old setup is the lack of options for red. If you don't want to force team mode openings on to the game and want to start with something slower more solo like, what do you play? Any other move than h3 gives blue and green the chance to play h3 King pawn themselves and attack you, giving them the advantage. If you prepare for this and play Queens Pawn forward one square and they don't bring queen out well you just waste a move because this pawn wants to go forward and push for promotion in a slower game, and if you play Queen pawn forward 2 and they bring the queen's out you have weakened the dark squares to much. If you push the C pawn sicilian this move is just bad vs certain lines of team mode attack. And bringing either knight out just gets attacked by rook pawn. There are no good moves for red in old setup other than h3. Which forces team mode openings and it goes round in circles until by move 15 it's the same position in every game. In omatamix red can basically play anything because they have 2 methods to play team mode openings and bring the Queen out. With h3 or with the C pawn. So red does not need to force team mode openings but can meet them easily if b/G try to force it. This is why I prefer omatamix over old setup but brsti does look interesting I have not looked at it yet though

 

Justin, I have read what you have written, and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. If you are smoking something extraordinary and see bright neon lights, please remember that sharing is caring.

Everything makes sense now

Avatar of LazyImp
JustinD7 wrote:

For something to not be awful is not quite what I'm looking in my opening choices but thanks! Let's let you risk your big over inflated rating with it instead

Your argument was that there were no other options for red besides h3.  I disagreed.  You have yet to provide a counterargument. I am waiting. 

Avatar of empty_K3

@Radon if you were a 3-player-Stage Player you would not care if the Setup were chess960.

But you are obviously not if Omatomix bothers you so much.

Avatar of LazyImp
JustinD7 wrote:

@Proffeserblundermaster  of blunders 

Simply saying that someone has 'no idea what they are talking about' is not a valid argument. You have to actually explain the specifics of what i said is incorrect or what you have that is a superior way of seeing things. Sorry but no sale. 

Whereas your arguments are nothing but impeccable logic

Avatar of empty_K3

@JustinD7 @LazyImp

The last statement was that Omatomix is boring because it is always the same. So Justin stated, that the old Standard is also always the same. And I fully agree with that. Yes there are different possibilities I play k4 and Illingworth climbed to #1 in solo with k4 but how many games do not start with h3?

And I am highly criticized for k4 because "it is so passive" so Justins statement that Old standard is repetitive and boring is at least as valid as the statement of those players who state that Omatomix is.

In high elo there is just not that much variation in the opening anymore. But that is true for every game not only 4PC. But still, no 2 games are the same and for me, it is always thrilling and entertaining no matter which setup.

So as long there is not a forced win for a player (which is basically not possible, because you can't force a win alone with 3 other players wanting to win as well) there is no problem with the starting setup being boring.

If the 3-player-stage is not entertaining enough for you, then go play teams. Maybe other setups are better for teams but for FFA/Solo Omatomix is the best setup.

Avatar of LazyImp
empty_K3 wrote:

@JustinD7 @LazyImp

The last statement was that Omatomix is boring because it is always the same. So Justin stated, that the old Standard is also always the same. And I fully agree with that. Yes there are different possibilities I play k4 and Illingworth climbed to #1 in solo with k4 but how many games do not start with h3?

And I am highly criticized for k4 because "it is so passive" so Justins statement that Old standard is repetitive and boring is at least as valid as the statement of those players who state that Omatomix is.

In high elo there is just not that much variation in the opening anymore. But that is true for every game not only 4PC. But still, no 2 games are the same and for me, it is always thrilling and entertaining no matter which setup.

So as long there is not a forced win for a player (which is basically not possible, because you can't force a win alone with 3 other players wanting to win as well) there is no problem with the starting setup being boring.

If the 3-player-stage is not entertaining enough for you, then go play teams. Maybe other setups are better for teams but for FFA/Solo Omatomix is the best setup.

My argument was more derived from the faulty argument of his last paragraph, where he claims anything but h3 is bad.  Especially the portions where he claims every option fails to being too weakening or otherwise bad.

Avatar of empty_K3

Well, I don't think everything else than h3 is bad, but as you might have noticed I mostly stand quite alone with my opinions. And I also have the feeling that basically every high elo player plays h3.

So I think old Standard is repetitive and boring, and Omatomix brings opening variation.

Avatar of ProfBlundermaster
JustinD7 wrote:

@Proffeserblundermaster  of blunders 

Simply saying that someone has 'no idea what they are talking about' is not a valid argument. You have to actually explain the specifics of what i said is incorrect or what you have that is a superior way of seeing things. Sorry but no sale. 

Justin, I have had numerous and very exhausting debates over the past few weeks with the other Admins, Developers, and 4PC Experts. All the points you brought up show that you really have no idea what you are talking about. Besides, most of the points are covered by @Radon and @LazyImp and others in this post and in numerous other posts in the forum.

Justin, I have noticed that you keep championing two things that I am completely against:

1) Oma (the rotational symmetry results in boring openings)

2) The Old FFA Rating system of +3 +1 -1 -3 (which allows people to play for 2nd place even at the highest levels)

Point 1 is championed by people without imaginations. Point 2 is championed by those who want a coward's way out aka play for 2nd.

I'll let @Radon and @LazyImp deal with the rest of the details if they have the patience and energy. I have adult things to do in real life, and I do not get paid to be Admin.

Avatar of empty_K3

@ProfBlundermaster

Regarding 1)
I am also a big fan of Omatomix, and I don't think it results in boring openings. And even if it does, I don't think that this is an issue for FFA/Solo because the Solo game is about the 3-player stage, so boring openings should not bother you much.

Regarding 2)
I fully agree with you. The +3 +1 -1 -3 is only for chickens who prefer to settle for 2nd instead of playing the game. The rating format I think would be best for FFA is +4 0 -1 -3 but also the +4 -1 -1 -2 suggested by @Radon seems good to me.

And to say that someone has no idea what he is talking about is neither nice nore productive.
And referring to @Radon and @LazyImp after that is not very helpful because those have never played a Solo world championship so I don't think they are the best to ask about high elo solo.

Avatar of LiquidFyre

his account is @ProfBlundermaster not @Proffeserblundermaster

Avatar of ChessMasterGS

This is a contest to churn out responses as fast as possible as if they’re trying to have an actual argument...

Avatar of empty_K3

@JustinD7

I think it's ok that people settle for 2nd. Makes it easier for me as a solo player to end a game. That people settle for 2nd is not an issue. That people play for 2nd is.

So splitting the game into a "fair game of teams" destroys the Idea of Solo. There is a teams mode for that. What you are wishing for is a mode between FFA and Teams. So basically a teams game that is played out until the end. This might be an interesting game mode as well, but I see it as a variant of teams, not as the main FFA mode.

Avatar of Typewriter44

Even if red was forced to play h3, that doesn't make the game repetitive. Back when high level FFA was actually played, you would see variations like h11 from yellow, c7 c6 from blue and green, c7/d7 Nc6, c7/d7 Nc9, d6, and sometimes even Nc9 from blue. After h3 c7 by all, RY can go for Bh2, e4 and Qk5, a solid Qj4 and Nf3. You don't even get the same position twice after 4 moves, let alone 10. 

As for the rating system, the old one seems like the best mix to me. We see 3 0 0 -3 as FFA, but really it is a true mix of Solo and FFA. Original 3 1 -1 -3 causes long-term teaming and playing for 2nd which is a problem, and 3 -1 -1 -1 leaves players losing rating because another player threw the game. 300-3 rewards playing with your opposite in the 4 player stage and playing pure solo in the 3 player stage. No other rating system does that (unless you believe that all players will play with their opposite and risk not even making it to the 3 player stage in pure solo just to not get sandwiched)

Avatar of BabYagun

This change was made in a hurry without proper voting. It will be reverted.

The default starting position may be changed in the future, probably to the "bsrti" setup. However, this will happen after proper deliberation.

Our apologies for the mess.

I've locked this thread. Please continue the "old vs bsrti vs oma" discussion in another thread.

This forum topic has been locked