Strategic ideas in 4 Player Chess

Sort:
Avatar of ChecksForTheChecksGod

So, since I wrote it already somewhere in this forum, I'll post it here.

This is the list of my strategic ideas (by "strategy" I mean "thinking in long terms") in 4PC.

Add your own!

Avatar of ChecksForTheChecksGod

So, my usual planning ideas are:

-to put my left opponent's pieces under attack, so that any other player could attack him later (and so, organize double attack)

-to pin my left opponent's pieces by the use of other players' pieces

-to supress my left opponent's pieces activity by my pawns and knights (and sometimes by attacking queen's squares by my minor pieces)

-to not attack my opposite very early in any game (maybe just to mate him in 1), at least until for becoming really stronger than my left opponent.

-to weaken my opposite just before we mate someone other

-to not allow any checks on my king or attacks on my queen (as much as possible), especially by player from the left

-to push my pawns for queening usually only after my left or right opponent's is mated or seriously weakened or very busy

-to clear routes for my rooks by attacking with rook pawns

-to clear routes for my bishops by moving my pawn structure

-to achieve solid pawn chains

-to castle only if my king's castle cannot be attacked by some pawns or be pinned

-to evacuate my king in safer place

-to maneuver my knight for gaining some kinky forks (usually in closed positions) and to weaken opponent's king's defense (usually in open positions).

Avatar of Arbunckle

What is your rating?

Avatar of ChessMasterGS

I would say that depending on your opposite’s usefulness that you don’t take mate in 1s, especially if your opposite is trusting you to not attack them - attacking a certain flank also usually doesn’t work because you will eventually in some games have to multitask with fending off your flanks (which will be easier if you have a competent opposite, otherwise taking a 3rd in ffa is probably preferable if your loss is unavoidable).

Avatar of ChecksForTheChecksGod
Arbunckle написал:

What is your rating?

I was 2162 when I wrote this

Avatar of ChessMasterGS
Orion-2000 wrote:

Who wants to play 4 Player Chess?

when will you ever learn to stop spamming in big colorful text? you've been told that for well over a year now

Avatar of chesswhizz9
Grable wrote:

. There is hardly ever significant enough reason to quote a user's entire posting in full.
If commenting, share your opinions within one post.

. If commenting, share your opinions within one post. Posting multiple replies within the same thread sequentially is considered spam. If you need to add to your previous statements, edit that comment instead of creating a new one.