@liquid-sun I agree if you help me perfect it, I'm delighted.
that same excel is from google and it is editable, we can repair it, in fact I continue adding new players that are on the radar.
@bsrti , @profblundermaster they are also helping in that matter.
Suggestion for "Performance Top 100"


I feel as if I'm very low on the list even though I'm better than like half the players lmao
What is your username? It seems to me that you changed it, can you confirm it for me.
Anyway 12 more players were added, which were missing from the list, next year it should be renewed, since accounts like kidbujohan, or others, changed their name.
Remember that they are representative assessments, we are discussing and working to improve it, to create statistics evaluated mathematically.
Temperament, psychology, strategy, are relevant evaluations in the 4pc, but nevertheless, they cannot be measurable mathematically, there is only a partial evaluation.
This is a first step, over time it will continue to improve and we hope to integrate it into the Player Profile Server in the future. We are discussing and studying its feasibility.
Invited to review the listings again.
https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/performance-top-100-of-the-best-players-in-the-world

What was the formula used for the temper?
I just said that there is no formula for that, which is a very important factor that must be considered.
But nevertheless, they cannot be measurable mathematically, there is only a partial evaluation.
Maybe you can help with this, however, we are looking at a way to measure it in another way with other expert players and administration staff, but any support or suggestion can be of help @ChessMasterGS

What was the formula used for the temper?
# of games one played with Luci as opposite without resigning

What was the formula used for the temper?
# of games one played with Luci as opposite without resigning
*How hard you attack Luci in 1 min FFA if he sacks one pawn on you

I feel as if I'm very low on the list even though I'm better than like half the players lmao
What is your username? It seems to me that you changed it, can you confirm it for me.
Anyway 12 more players were added, which were missing from the list, next year it should be renewed, since accounts like kidbujohan, or others, changed their name.
Remember that they are representative assessments, we are discussing and working to improve it, to create statistics evaluated mathematically.
Temperament, psychology, strategy, are relevant evaluations in the 4pc, but nevertheless, they cannot be measurable mathematically, there is only a partial evaluation.
This is a first step, over time it will continue to improve and we hope to integrate it into the Player Profile Server in the future. We are discussing and studying its feasibility.
Invited to review the listings again.
https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/performance-top-100-of-the-best-players-in-the-world
my current username is a reference to two of my previous accounts, JkCheeseChess and APhoenixOnFire
Hello everyone,
I think that Martin's efforts to make a Performance Top 100 is a really cool idea and I definitely appreciate the effort to begin putting this list together.
(LINK: https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/performance-top-100-of-the-best-players-in-the-world)
That said, I think that some of the scoring in this list is a bit inaccurate. For example, I was given a rating of 75 for tactics, but I think that tactics are one of my stronger abilities: I have consistently tactically out-maneuvered numerous names on this list with tactical scores in the 90s.
I think these inaccuracies extend to numerous other names on the list. My suggestion is for the list to be redone via the consensus of numerous high-rated players from both teams and FFA.