I just know that the first one, the historic one, was +13 -1 -3 -9
this one was perfect, why change it?
https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/1/161/1
I just know that the first one, the historic one, was +13 -1 -3 -9
this one was perfect, why change it?
https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/1/161/1
I just know that the first one, the historic one, was +13 -1 -3 -9
this one was perfect, why change it?
https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/1/161/1
Just for your information... We had MILLIONS of games before the games began to be registered. I think I was playing for easily 1,5-2 years already when it was implemented.
I just know that the first one, the historic one, was +13 -1 -3 -9
this one was perfect, why change it?
https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/1/161/1
Just for your information... We had MILLIONS of games before the games began to be registered. I think I was playing for easily 1,5-2 years already when it was implemented.
Than what's the first one? +18 -3 -6 -9 ? +1 -¼ -⅓ - ⁵∕₁₂ ?
Or they dœsn't have rating so it was 0 0 0 0 ?
I just think it would be interesting to be able to see past leaderboards. Like the Teams Rapid Leaderboard for June 13th, 2019 for example. In addition, it adds more 'permanency' and probably interest. The flaw in the idea is implementation+perhaps encourages people to sit on their rating