I resigned because he tought that it was ok to not play what your teammate suggests you for 5 moves. he thinks we can play solo and duo at the same time basically playing what WE think its ok to play. I don't need that type of teammates
Teams Puzzle #14/#135 (I want to see if I guessed right move)
Sort:
httpps://www.chess.com/variants/4-player-chess/game/28413188/21/1
on move 3, my teammate played Qi7 (that's ok, if he waited for me to react to his arrows, but he didn't and played it after 0.5 sec). you can see our private conversation, and I told him to play slower and didn't get respond. Move 4 he plays Nf12 without arrows aand after a sec. better move was I think Bxl8( killer move for 1900s ). Only 2300s+ can sometimes find counterattack to those moves, and you'll never know, what happenns after you take if you don't takee it. The opponent mus prove, that your move wass wrong, how? idk. Move 5, he wants to develop a knight, but I show him to play Bxl8 again, but he plays Ni12 anyway. That's where I resigned. Probably was he thinking that diffrence in our ratings is only 50 and that he can play whatever he thinks is right because we think almost thee same way because of our ratings, you can develop your pieces in any game, but you cannot try new "scary moves" every game.
what do you think about this game?