The Bug Thread

Sort:
IntelligentChessOwl8

4 Player Chess - Game #8318197 - TriD11, cosoriop, JacJac06, IntelligentChessOwl8 - Chess.com

Play-banned

I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font

HOW TO FIX PLS

JkCheeseTheIdotNoob

what font

ChessMasterGS
Play-banned wrote:

I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font

HOW TO FIX PLS

Chat_Banned is on a chromebook, and is probably why he has that font.

I myself sometimes play on a Windows 7 computer, and it can't even read ⅒, so on W7 it just looks like this: 𝥂|0 Solo

Get a new computer if you want different fonts grin.png

JkCheeseTheIdotNoob

yeah

 

Play-banned
ChessMasterGS wrote:
Play-banned wrote:

I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font

HOW TO FIX PLS

Chat_Banned is on a chromebook, and is probably why he has that font.

I myself sometimes play on a Windows 7 computer, and it can't even read ⅒, so on W7 it just looks like this: 𝥂|0 Solo

Get a new computer if you want different fonts

no everyone but I has that font

ila12345

yeah. I was watching 2-Player upside down and Bastions game started. i could see only the pawns.

oatey

Hi spacebar

Not sure if its a bug, a planned change, or I have accidentally changed something in my settings, but in Chaturaji now, whenever I move my cursor over a square, I get coordinates showing up big inside that square...It is really distracting, is there a way to turn it off?

 

Cheers 

AdamRaichu

Yes. Just press K to toggle it on and off.

 

If you have problems like this in the future, try pressing "h" from 4pc. It brings up a list of keyboard shortcuts.

oatey

Ahh thanks a lot guys!

GamerPlayz02

Capablanca Chess "Teams" error and therefore NaN. Need a fix

ChessMasterGS
  1. Be a free member.
  2. Go to analysis board, then quit out. 
  3. Ads have disappeared.
  4. Go into a game.
  5. Ads reappear.
kylepratt547

Hello,

I'm not sure this is a 'bug' per se but the I have been playing chaturaji on the variants server and I noticed that the notation doesn't always match the points awarded for triple/double check.

The rules do not stipulate 'other' players and in this game, https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturaji/game/18216681/160/1

in the last moves the notation shows +++ but the points awarded are for a double check(++). The third player being checked is themselves, and rules only say "checking two/three players simultaneously "

Could the rules be updated for clarity to include the stipulation of points awarded for checking "other" players simultaneously? 

Thanks for your time,

Kyle

MrXX2018
kylepratt547 написал:

Hello,

I'm not sure this is a 'bug' per se but the I have been playing chaturaji on the variants server and I noticed that the notation doesn't always match the points awarded for triple/double check.

The rules do not stipulate 'other' players and in this game, https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturaji/game/18216681/160/1

in the last moves the notation shows +++ but the points awarded are for a double check(++). The third player being checked is themselves, and rules only say "checking two/three players simultaneously "

Could the rules be updated for clarity to include the stipulation of points awarded for checking "other" players simultaneously? 

Thanks for your time,

Kyle

On variants server in Chaturaji +1pt for double check and +5pts for triple check. Look at variant full description

kylepratt547
MrXX2018 wrote:
kylepratt547 написал:

Hello,

I'm not sure this is a 'bug' per se but the I have been playing chaturaji on the variants server and I noticed that the notation doesn't always match the points awarded for triple/double check.

The rules do not stipulate 'other' players and in this game, https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturaji/game/18216681/160/1

in the last moves the notation shows +++ but the points awarded are for a double check(++). The third player being checked is themselves, and rules only say "checking two/three players simultaneously "

Could the rules be updated for clarity to include the stipulation of points awarded for checking "other" players simultaneously? 

Thanks for your time,

Kyle

On variants server in Chaturaji +1pt for double check and +5pts for triple check. Look at variant full description

I see that the points awarded for double/triple check are different on 4pc server vs. variants (5/20) as opposed to (1/5). However, that was not my question. My question was threefold. 

1. The rules say checking 2 or 3 players simultaneously 1 or 5 points. "

2. The example game notation showed Blue move 47. Kxf2+++

3. The points awarded in that game on that move are for a double check (one point).

 

Adding the word 'other' to the rules would fix this 'bug'

 

I hope this is clearer. Is there anyway that this change could be made? The other option as I see it would be to follow the notation and start awarding points for walking into check.

 

MrXX2018
kylepratt547 написал:

Adding the word 'other' to the rules would fix this 'bug'

 

Now I got it. You right

JkCheeseTheIdotNoob

Okay, this might sound weird (and I almost got visual proof but my partner left the queue):

The rating limit didn't work. I am a 2306 rated rapid teams player, but I found a queue that had a limit of <2000. I don't know how that happened, and when I invited my partner, @TheChessDude991, who is also 2000+, he was able to receive and accept the invite. I couldn't find a way to "recreate the bug," but just know that it exists.

TheChessDude991
JkCheeseChess wrote:

Okay, this might sound weird (and I almost got visual proof but my partner left the queue):

The rating limit didn't work. I am a 2306 rated rapid teams player, but I found a queue that had a limit of <2000. I don't know how that happened, and when I invited my partner, @TheChessDude991, who is also 2000+, he was able to receive and accept the invite. I couldn't find a way to "recreate the bug," but just know that it exists.

I confirm this. 

HighEldar

So I haven't played a rated game (and I think also even a casual game) of FFA in over 2 weeks.

When I go to create a new game I nottice the rating range is set to the deafult 1500 as opposed to my true rating ~2100 or so.

HighEldar

Wait, my mistake. It's because it was on a Blitz game and I'm not rated for blitz lol

Sorry about that - false alarm

This forum topic has been locked