I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font
HOW TO FIX PLS
I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font
HOW TO FIX PLS
I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font
HOW TO FIX PLS
Chat_Banned is on a chromebook, and is probably why he has that font.
I myself sometimes play on a Windows 7 computer, and it can't even read ⅒, so on W7 it just looks like this: 𝥂|0 Solo
Get a new computer if you want different fonts
I cannot change font. WHAT HAPPENED MAN Mime is still old font, complared to @Chat_Banned's font
HOW TO FIX PLS
Chat_Banned is on a chromebook, and is probably why he has that font.
I myself sometimes play on a Windows 7 computer, and it can't even read ⅒, so on W7 it just looks like this: 𝥂|0 Solo
Get a new computer if you want different fonts
no everyone but I has that font
Hi spacebar
Not sure if its a bug, a planned change, or I have accidentally changed something in my settings, but in Chaturaji now, whenever I move my cursor over a square, I get coordinates showing up big inside that square...It is really distracting, is there a way to turn it off?
Cheers
Yes. Just press K to toggle it on and off.
If you have problems like this in the future, try pressing "h" from 4pc. It brings up a list of keyboard shortcuts.
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a 'bug' per se but the I have been playing chaturaji on the variants server and I noticed that the notation doesn't always match the points awarded for triple/double check.
The rules do not stipulate 'other' players and in this game, https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturaji/game/18216681/160/1
in the last moves the notation shows +++ but the points awarded are for a double check(++). The third player being checked is themselves, and rules only say "checking two/three players simultaneously "
Could the rules be updated for clarity to include the stipulation of points awarded for checking "other" players simultaneously?
Thanks for your time,
Kyle
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a 'bug' per se but the I have been playing chaturaji on the variants server and I noticed that the notation doesn't always match the points awarded for triple/double check.
The rules do not stipulate 'other' players and in this game, https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturaji/game/18216681/160/1
in the last moves the notation shows +++ but the points awarded are for a double check(++). The third player being checked is themselves, and rules only say "checking two/three players simultaneously "
Could the rules be updated for clarity to include the stipulation of points awarded for checking "other" players simultaneously?
Thanks for your time,
Kyle
On variants server in Chaturaji +1pt for double check and +5pts for triple check. Look at variant full description
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a 'bug' per se but the I have been playing chaturaji on the variants server and I noticed that the notation doesn't always match the points awarded for triple/double check.
The rules do not stipulate 'other' players and in this game, https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturaji/game/18216681/160/1
in the last moves the notation shows +++ but the points awarded are for a double check(++). The third player being checked is themselves, and rules only say "checking two/three players simultaneously "
Could the rules be updated for clarity to include the stipulation of points awarded for checking "other" players simultaneously?
Thanks for your time,
Kyle
On variants server in Chaturaji +1pt for double check and +5pts for triple check. Look at variant full description
I see that the points awarded for double/triple check are different on 4pc server vs. variants (5/20) as opposed to (1/5). However, that was not my question. My question was threefold.
1. The rules say checking 2 or 3 players simultaneously 1 or 5 points. "
2. The example game notation showed Blue move 47. Kxf2+++
3. The points awarded in that game on that move are for a double check (one point).
Adding the word 'other' to the rules would fix this 'bug'
I hope this is clearer. Is there anyway that this change could be made? The other option as I see it would be to follow the notation and start awarding points for walking into check.
Adding the word 'other' to the rules would fix this 'bug'
Now I got it. You right
Okay, this might sound weird (and I almost got visual proof but my partner left the queue):
The rating limit didn't work. I am a 2306 rated rapid teams player, but I found a queue that had a limit of <2000. I don't know how that happened, and when I invited my partner, @TheChessDude991, who is also 2000+, he was able to receive and accept the invite. I couldn't find a way to "recreate the bug," but just know that it exists.
Okay, this might sound weird (and I almost got visual proof but my partner left the queue):
The rating limit didn't work. I am a 2306 rated rapid teams player, but I found a queue that had a limit of <2000. I don't know how that happened, and when I invited my partner, @TheChessDude991, who is also 2000+, he was able to receive and accept the invite. I couldn't find a way to "recreate the bug," but just know that it exists.
I confirm this.
4 Player Chess - Game #8318197 - TriD11, cosoriop, JacJac06, IntelligentChessOwl8 - Chess.com