Well, it's still unjustifiably vain to suppose a device which is nothing more than a network of unreliable analog processors that has evolved by the forces of evolution will be intrinsically superior to a computer, unless being unreliable is considered a virtue.
If Penrose's argument applies to anything, it might be the intellectual achievements of life as a whole (perhaps every descendent of humans). Even then it could run into problems with the finite processing capacity of the Universe (presuming this is true).
Elroch, it's unclear to me which post you're replying to. Given the timing, it seems like you're replying to mine, but it also seems like we're arguing the same side.
Well, it's still unjustifiably vain to suppose a device which is nothing more than a network of unreliable analog processors that has evolved by the forces of evolution will be intrinsically superior to a computer, unless being unreliable is considered a virtue.
If Penrose's argument applies to anything, it might be the intellectual achievements of life as a whole (perhaps every descendent of humans). Even then it could run into problems with the finite processing capacity of the Universe (presuming this is true).