just take the pawn , after nc6 , go nf3 , and if Qe7 , go c3 avoiding the Qb4 check , then if knight takes on e5 , just take back the knight and go Nd2 to keep developpinng , it's the most practical response but not necessarily the best objectivly .
the best way to refute that dumb gambit is in this study done by GM daniel Naroditsky.
https://lichess.org/study/inBWS4oN
Thanks so much I find people are playing it more often then when I learned the london
Don't worry about what the GM says;besides its on lichess anyways yeah c3 is decent or anything that makes qb4 a bad move is good as its blacks only trick
also 3.f4 is a nice sideline even if it weakens squares around your king although not reccomendable untill higher levels
when playing the london, what am i supposed to do against the englund gambit