Theory of Everything
Sort:
Be happy too. But you will have to learn to be able to reason first. Let us know when you start. However we do need summary #75 now. Kind of nice to have some 80 summaries and we still need to add some new ones on photon creation. You did read them, didn't you ?
So, Paul, if you know all of this without a shadow of a doubt, and if most of this is against almost all understandings of physics as we currently know it, why have you not tried publishing any of this. You seem to claim that you know more than every expert in any field of physics on earth, but you are only sharing this on chess forums.
I think because the way you are going about showing this is claiming it is true and moving on. There is no scientific process. There is no pier review. And you haven't made any testable predictions with any of it. This is what you need to have a valid scientific publication. On top of it all, you claim that fundamental scientific principles are wrong.
For example, you said quantum mechanics is wrong in another post. However, QM is easily that most well-tested and accurate theory of anything that we have ever produced. We may not like the evidence, but it has substantial evidence none the less. So we are forced into accepting it, because that what a scientist does. He changes his world view based on all of the evidence put in front of him or her. You haven't put anything in front of me that could possibly change my mind. Only a list of unsupported claims about the universe.
Here is what I propose that we do. You give us your most fundamental principle that you based all of this on. Then, we will collect the arguments and evidence for or against it. If it leads to logical contradictions or is unsupported by evidence, we throw it out. If not, you give us your second fundamental principle and so on. If you can systematically show me that each and every item on this is true, I promise that I will drop out of Grad school to begin going door-to-door telling people about your genius and your ToE. Because it clearly would need to be shared with the world. But if even one step in logic is shown to have a fallacy, then the whole thing comes apart.
Thanks dnivickers; that may be the most reasonable statement every made about this physics. Let me try to answer each of your thoughts. 1. I have no doubts. None. Read some of the physics from the OTHER side. Is GR correct is there DM, doubts, doubts. Why none here, cause as far as I understand it, everything fits. 2. Published, I try, try, try. No one will even starts. 3. I am not very smart, less then most here. But I was lucky and STARTED CORRECTLY. TIme and length are discrete. 4. QM, particles run into themselfs, problem, there are an infinite other paths it could take. The electron runs into a path a second electron thur the other slit toke. 5. Fundimental; Time and distance are discrete. THEY combine to form a preon and everything is built from 3 of these. I list the structure of EVERY particle and there are only particles. BUT I said all this again and again. Some one has to ask a question if you want to understand.
EVERY summary is correct or I am completely wrong. 80 How can it be clearer; find one wrong !!!!
So, what then, is the fundamental principle to look at first? Where all of this comes from?
I think it is the way one reasons, not any specific data.
I am just going to add an 80th summary. I am just about to say that the photon we see is NOT generated by a particle we would think of, but by the space particle in EVERY case. I would never, never, never think that. But it is beginning to fit, except for a part here and there. See it is not easy either. And it is only the real photon this happens to, that part already fits. I suggested this 10 days ago in the notes. The problem is I do not know how the spock starts the process, but watch. it will fit when I find it.
Mar 22, 2017
0
#8
The problem is that Feynman can work out the magnetic moment of the electron correctly, and you can't. That's the difference between real science and some sort of facsimile.
I'm being trolled, right?
Sorry Dnlvickers, I am not sure what you are asking. If I go back one note, it was where do I start. The theory of everything, is just that everything and I am not sure that subject has a good starting point. However nothing fits better or has more subject than how a particle is built. So start with a preon in groups of 3 and you get particles. There are 10 tables so you can look at any one table. The Fermions fit perfectly (LLH). The other 9 lead to something new. 2nd, nothing is solved better than a proton in the LHC. Think of that , a proton at the speed of light interacting with particles at the speed of light so that it is STABLE. That is so far from where physics is today, it is unbelieveable. AND IT HAS AN ANSWER, try that with your physics. And then there is the (LLL) table, space. Since the preons all have specific properties, space has the properties of 3 L preons. That is also unbelieveable compared to physics today. It's those properties and nothing else. Space wasn't here first, doesn't double, has a reason for C, and solves a stable black hole, etc. Then there is the first and second particles after the BB. (EHH,EEE). No physics even suggests that, and explains inflation. ALL this may be what you are beginning to see. OR ask me a question I can understand better, I am happy to answer you any time.
Mar 28, 2017
0
#11
Let's see you solve a problem in fundamental physics using your approach, to show it has some substance. I'm being deliberately vague, so as to give you plenty of freedom.
Sure; 10**-100m + 10*-100m = 2*10**-100m. THAT IS WRONG !!!
Would you like to PROVE IT IS TRUE ? IF you think that is true it is the math that is true; NOT THE PHYSICS.
HOWEVER E+E = 2*E in both cases. E is 10**-85m .
What happen to dnl ?
Mar 28, 2017
0
#13
10^-100 m is much less than the Planck length. I don't believe lengths of this size are useful at all. It's like we only have a tape measure and are talking about measuring femtometers with it.
"NOT USEFUL" If distance is continuous , than you can add them. YOU either can or you can't. You asked me to solve a FUNDIMENTAL problem. I just did. And your answer was, that it is not useful. IT is to me because it is the start of proving distances are not continuous. I asked you if there was a FIRST particle at the time of the Big Bang, The particles that the first particle creates are about that size. So why is that not useful ? And thanks, seems I left out those summerary statements.
Mar 30, 2017
0
#15
Physics is about measurements: numbers are just a way to represent those measurements.
A number that is nothing to do with any measurement is not useful. It is a bit ridiculous when you would need the mass of a galaxy in a particle to differentiate such a distance, given that such a mass simply cannot be small.
First you say Physics is about measurments and then you say the small numbers are not useful and ridiculious. Let's see; the volume of a space particle is 10**-105 cm. The volume of an electron is R times smaller. The volume of a photon is R times smaller than an electron. We can now fine the charge density and energy density. The volume of the unit mass is R times smaller than a photon. We can now find the mass density. So with a little more reasoning we find the mass density in what you call a black hole is about .04 ev/cc per 10**-165cm. Maybe you are right; who would want to know that !!! Oh ! that must be why you have no idea how much mass is in a particle of dark matter. It's NOT USEFUL and RIDICULIOUS. You are right about that too since it's DM.
A Theory of Everything, summary.
1. Nature is simple.
2. Nothing is nothing, only nothing.
3. Points do not exist.
4. Time and distance are discrete, not continuous.
5. Time and distance always occur together, physics can not have one without the other.
6. All the math in the elementary physics that we know uses continuous time and distance and therefor is wrong.
7. Zu (zero degree of freedom universe) is a nothing that allows unused time to accumulate and the amount accumulated is zero.
8. Zu has a distance, not distances.
9. Unused Time accumulating in Zu keeps getting “bigger”, but no time is passing.
10. Zu is where borrow energy comes from and returns to.
11. Discrete time has 3 modes, (1) unused Time, (2) used Time, (3) and Time used to start each time tick or cycle.
12. Used Time is a Tidom, (Time degree of freedom), a preon.
13. Preons build ALL elementary particles, and only preons.
14. The universe only has elementary particles built from preons.
15. Tidoms are discrete Time and Distance.
16. Tidoms are momentum, momentum is more fundamental than time or distance, one does don exist without the other.
17. A Tidom has a time cycle.
18. There are 3 different Tidoms, L(low), H(high), E(extreme) frequencies.
19. The L Tidom is Planck’s time and Planck’s length.
20. The L,H & E Tidom all differ by a factor of R (10**20) in time duration and length. Thus all 3 have a ratio of C for length divided by time.
21. There is always and only 3 Tidoms per particle with one “point” in common.
22. There are always 3 Tidom per particle because starting time in each requires at least 3 and more would require more time to start.
23. A Tidom may be right or left handed, matter or antimatter.
24. There are 10 tables of particles from the various combinations of the (L,H,E) Tidoms. Thus (LLL) thru (EEE).
25. (LLL) are Spocks, (space Blocks or space particles).
26. (LLH) Fermions.
27. (LHH) Bosons.
28. (HHH) Unit mass, Mu.
29. The property of charge comes from the point in common of either the L or H Tidom being the midpoint.
30. The property of color comes from the point in common of the H tidom being shifted 45 degrees down the length of the preon. Colors are always and only in the order 1,2,3.
31. The properties of each preon is defined by (0,1,2,3), where the point in common is (0) if an end point, (2) if in the middle with the property of charge, (1) if color and (3) with both color and charge.
32. The Fermions are then (000) thru (223), with 12 different states. We know of 4 Fermions, (000) neutrino, (021) plus quark, (222) electron, (003) negative quark. Each of these 4 states has a different H value.
33. The other 8 states do not exist in nature because of the “large” amount of time needed to start the preons if the H tidom is not the 0 state.
34. Each tidom controls, determines independently the number of mass particles in each particle.
35. There are always 3 different mass states for any particle from the 3 preons. A massless state may be one state.
36. The Bosons are (000) thru (233), with 20 different states. The particles are; (000) photon, (001) gluon, (022) magon, (200) spon, (222) charon.
37. All Bosons interact with themselves except the photon.
38. The spon is the “force” which moves the space particles, (spocks).
39. Normally the spock has no mass of its own.
40. Spocks flow from high density volume to low density via the spon.
41. The other three tables of particles are, (HHE) Eu, the first particle in the universe. (HEE) Fu, the unit force or graviton, (EEE) Sm, supermass, the first particle to decay from Eu. Each was R**3 times the mass of the neutrino, about the size of a galaxy.
42. Energy Chains have a single length, R*L.
43. Two quarks are held together by a single energy chain.
44. Quarks build systems of elementary particles.
45. Three quarks form a plain. Quarks always lie on this plain and only this plain.
46. The three quarks form an equilateral triangle, only this triangle. Each quark is held together by 2 legs at a 69% angle.
47. Consider the base leg of the triangle to be the leg the same two charged quarks. This leg then requires a stronger color force.
48. A 4th quark can not be added over or under this triangle. This would cause the 4th quark to be unstable as there are only 3 colors and each color must be different.
49. The 4th quark must be added on the original plain and at a distance of R*L from the 2 quarks from the same leg, thus forming a 2nd equilateral triangle.
50. Any number of quarks may form a particle system, however all are not stable.
51. The 4th quark added is normally from a proton or neutron. Thus, we are adding 3 quarks. All fall on the original plain.
52. The first system is PN4. Proton, Neutron and 4 triangles.
53. Quarks all lie on a plain. Each new plain is parallel or a right angles to all the other plains.
54. The alpha particle is two PN4s. Each on a parallel plain separated by the height of the plain, NP;PN4. The positive quarks are in the center.
55. ALL isotopes are built from these two structures; NP4 & NPN14.
56. The positive quarks are never closes to the outside of the structure. Positive quarks with only two legs are unstable. Proton is the only exception because there are only 2 plus quarks on the parallel line.
57. The parallel lines may contain 5 negative quarks, but only 4 positive quarks because of the difference in charge.
58. Any isotope may contain many different structures of the PN4 & NPN14. Each different structure will have a different total energy and a different electron orbit.
59. From the outside the parallel lines lie at the vertex of a perfect square.
60. Only the negative quarks are at the outer most positions.
61. The structure, if seen from two sides will form a rectangle who’s parts are all perfect squares.
61. The corners of the squares are alternating plus and minus lines.
62. the maximum number of legs a quark in the nucleus interacts with is 10. Two quarks of the same charge on the parallel line and 8 of opposite charge on the legs at 60% to that line.
63. The color of all quarks is determined by assigning 2 colors to any leg. There are always an equal number of each color.
64. All quarks change color each L tick. There is only one order of color change, (1,2,3).
65. For gravity the energy chains form a line of sight chain, (LSC). This chain may be a billion light years long built from single energy chains.
66. The LSC is always strongest if there is NO velocity at right angles to the chain.
67. For the interaction of gravity between two clusters of galaxies the force is about 10 times stronger then “normal” gravity.
68. For the interaction between two centers of galaxies the force is about 10 times stronger than normal gravity.
69. For the interaction between any star and the center of a galaxy the force is about 2 times stronger than normal.
70. For a barred galaxy the force varies along the bar. The ouiter edge is 3 times stronger than at 1/3 the distance out the bar.
71. The bar has a cross section. The stars move out the leading edge and the gas moves in the trailing edge. Just ahead of the leading edge , gravity is normal.
72. The arm from the bar forma second LSC which pulls the stars ouit of the bar and into the arm.
73. Normally the LSC only interacts between the centers of a pair of galaxies. This is why all those pair are “warped’ galaxies.
74. The Bullet Cluster is a pair of clusters interacting at a high cross velocity. This produces normal Gravity.
75. ABEL520 is a pair of clusters interacting at a very slow cross velocity. This produces a gravity which will pull the centers of two galaxies out of each galaxy. The centers are found on the plain of closes approach. The force can reach 100 times normal just before and after the centers closes approach to each other.
76. The neutrino will form an energy chain also. Massless particles form chains that reverse direction each time a particle passes thru that chain. The neutrino with mass only has a chain in ONE direction. Thus, in a pulse of neutrino over some time will the later neutrino see the effect of the chain. The pulse changes so that the later neutrinos have “moved” closer to the beginning of the pulse.
77. The Opera1 experiment showed the effect on the neutrinos. Only the later neutrino produced in the pulse were effected and moved to an earlier spot in the end result pulse.
78. A Super Nova produces an arrival pulse where ALL the neutrino arrive in the first 13 seconds and NONE over the 20 yearsof the initial pulse are ever detected.
79. We have left off the “blanket’ effect which explains an electron in orbit. The blanket is created by the charons and megons in a blanked around the nucleus holding the electron in orbit. There are nearly 10000 in the blanket around the proton.