Haven't added the cap yet, it'll be a while before I get around to that
this game is dead
Sort:
@battlemind cool! Of course high rated players will have to wait longer, but I think we all understand it and prefer it this way.
I personally think letting the player set their prefered range is the best solution, but then I have no idea how that translates into programming complications.
Ne2willdo wrote:
Of course you have to be good to make it to the top 10. For those who compare it to poker: Poker is GAMBLING! There is no point in playing poker if there is no money involved. The poker industry lets people believe poker is a game of skill, and there is some skill involved, but never as much as they would let you beleive.
There's tons of skill in poker and its an incredibly complex game with alot of required theory and knowledge. I know because I play full time. If you think it's mostly luck then you're a fish.
Decided not to add the +-200 cap yet as it would be detrimental to the matchmaker times. Instead, for those that would like to have a choice, we have added a "preferred rating range" in the settings.
@squishey
FFA is a stupid game, team mode is the future.
FFA with weak players is stupid, FFA with good players only is interesting. But I agree team mode is a lot more exciting, it's a game of pure skill.
Just saw a 2000+ vs two 1400s and one 1600. @battleMind24 can you confirm when you've added that cap?
Teams is awesome by the way.