Underdog of the week #2: Typewriter44

Sort:
rychessmaster1

@Typewriter44 ended with a solid performance of 7.5/10(Maybe it should have been 8/10 because of some cheater). He blogged about his performance so i'm gonna look at two of his games with both his annotations and mine(Not using engine so I might make mistakes)

Type vs @SapphireGlacer

 @Champions vs Type
Congrats to type!

BigThighsMan

Still think the kitty person should have won. A 1400 going 4/10 is not easy

sapphireglacier

@rychessmaster i always perform above my rating, yet i never perform too well, except once when i gained 100 pts with 7/10

jason543
Rustyhelmet wrote:

Still think the kitty person should have won. A 1400 going 4/10 is not easy

the problem is their wins were not impressive

check out my wins

i mean come on it was like 2000, 1700, 1000 1100 and then a bunch more 1100s

BigThighsMan
jason543 wrote:
Rustyhelmet wrote:

Still think the kitty person should have won. A 1400 going 4/10 is not easy

the problem is their wins were not impressive

check out my wins

i mean come on it was like 2000, 1700, 1000 1100 and then a bunch more 1100s

with a loss against a 1300

BigThighsMan

I dont totally agree with this @pineapplepro123 also got 7.5/10 and lost the cheater 

 
Typewriter44

okay yeah so my commentary on the beginning of the 2nd game was stupid

I was tired and wasn't paying much attention

jason543
Typewriter44 wrote:

okay yeah so my commentary on the beginning of the 2nd game was stupid

I was tired and wasn't paying much attention

quoted

PleasantEscalator

I beat kitty barely since she blundered a draw in a time scramble

PleasantEscalator

She played exceptionally well up until she blundered

PleasantEscalator

She should get underdog of the week

sapphireglacier

nah

Savorymcmuffin

I think you need to include the winner in the tourneys, consistency is more important than high upsets.

Typewriter44

that's what the monthly reports are for genius