This is a cool side line, and one that doesn't seem to have much analysis out there. It strikes me as having similar flavours to the Englund Gambit, although I'm sure it's more sound and has greater chances for complications.
Look forward to seeing some games!
I've been playing the BDG more seriously now for a number of months (on another chess site) and I've focused on the von Popiel Gambit. It is as follows:
Computer evaluation shows this as inferior to the 4. f3 variation. But I like it better because the moves your opponent will play are super predictable. One downside is that your opponent may choose to play 5. ...d6 to transpose into the French. I don't mind this because I have several aggressive French variations that I like to play. You can play 6. f3 at this point if you're committed to the BDG, but I think there are more aggressive lines in the French.
It is literally SO EASY for your opponent to drop a piece in this version. Here is a trap I have pulled off so many times I can't even count... mostly resulting in instant resignation by Black (because they are so pissed-off that they fell for it haha).
Your opponent might get extra greedy. Bad news if they do. There are some ways for Black to limit the damage but very hard to find in a game with little time and unknown territory. This is a very common scenario that I've had plenty of times:
I encourage you to give this variation a shot. There are a ton of traps, and even if Black plays some of the better moves, you get a nice attacking, sharp game. For example:
I'm not saying the above is better for White. It's not. It's pretty fun to play though and asks Black all the questions.
Anyway, I'll look to post a few example games sometime. For now, I encourage you to spend a week or so playing this variation. You may never go back to the typical BDG lines