S o it says after each day there was an evening and a morning. That kind of sounds like a 24 hour day.
What do we do with a literal six day creation Exodus 20:11?

I think we've made our respective positions clear. I have no problem with you being a YEC. It's not a salvation issue and I would be happy to worship the creator with anyone who accepts Jesus regardless of their positions on the age of the earth or any other non-Salvation issue.
My biggest concern is that if you may find a young person that has a strong science teacher that makes him/her believe that the earth is old and/or evolution is true. Please remember to tell them that there are some Christians who do believe in an old earth. If he is accepting evolution, please direct him/her to the bios-logos camp (not mine, but still Christian). The most important thing is they accept Jesus and the cross. After that, they will follow the path Jesus sets for them. Can we all agree on that?

[Gen 2:1-3 KJV] 1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

I'm sure we can all agree on that. But the Bible does seem to say that after each day was an evening and a morning, which does sound like a 24 hour day. I don't really see where it definitely says that it was billions of years or one week.

v.6 is the best verse for us:
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Here God calls the period of a light and dark a Day. Then just a few words later is the 'day' we're arguing about.

Hinduism actually has different animals in their scientifically agreed upon years ago.
I don't have a problem with the Bible though. It's just that if you want it to agree with current science, it helps to stretch a little.

Hinduism actually has different animals in their scientifically agreed upon years ago.
I don't have a problem with the Bible though. It's just that if you want it to agree with current science, it helps to stretch a little.
dude you can't 'stretch' the Bible. The Bible is the holy, inerrant, inspired Word of God.

Hinduism actually has different animals in their scientifically agreed upon years ago.
I don't have a problem with the Bible though. It's just that if you want it to agree with current science, it helps to stretch a little.
dude you can't 'stretch' the Bible. The Bible is the holy, inerrant, inspired Word of God.
The reason there were 4 gospels is because the 4 writers would remember things differently.
Of course science changes. I'm just trying to get a decent position from you guys about doing missionary work for Christ.
Again, if this club is cool with me I am cool with it.

Hinduism actually has different animals in their scientifically agreed upon years ago.
I don't have a problem with the Bible though. It's just that if you want it to agree with current science, it helps to stretch a little.
Let God and His word be true, and every man a liar. Stretch science to fit the Bible, don't stretch the Bible to fit science.

Hinduism actually has different animals in their scientifically agreed upon years ago.
I don't have a problem with the Bible though. It's just that if you want it to agree with current science, it helps to stretch a little.
Let God and His word be true, and every man a liar. Stretch science to fit the Bible, don't stretch the Bible to fit science.
I am not a fundamentalist. Hope that's OK with you guys.

I wouldn't say that only fundamentalists are Christians/that you have to be fundamentalist to be Christian at all, but I do think the fundamentalist position is the best position to hold.

I think the reason we have four gospels is because the authors would remember things differently. I don't think the Bible was recorded perfectly and there are certainly different translations. I don't think it was translated perfectly.
That doesn't mean we don't have a perfect product though. What we have now may be better than what it would have been without change!
Gen 1:1