Omatamix Setup: Contrary to popular belief, this setup is fine. Although it is incredibly repetitive, boring, and sometimes ambiguous when considering what ideas there actually are within the current position, you can get unique games by move 5. And while I do think the lack of solid theory except for the 3 or so different openings and 5 variations might be an issue, it's not exactly as bad as everyone makes it seem. Although any of the other three choices would be much better lol
Now that I think about it, the only actual issue I have with this setup is how green realistically only has one move to play in the beginning or else you risk getting mated on move 2, to think that a mate is possible that early is just extremely disturbing to me. Other than that, I have no problem waiting a few turns for the game to get unique.
I stop playing when FFA was killed and solo became standard, so I've been AFK for a while. I'm trying to get back into 4p chess and obviously, the starting positions have changed and it has thrown me off a little. I personally prefer the old setup, but it's mostly just because It's what I'm used to. From my understanding, it was changed to balance out the win percentage of each color. unlike when en passant was introduced and I felt like Hitler returned to take control of 4-player chess just to torture me and ruin my games, I can get behind this change as it makes the game fair and that's a good thing. (I did eventually come to love the introduction of en passant)
Now I'm looking at the BY setup and BYG setup and I'm lost on whether these setups are good and how they change the gameplay. Why are these setups being introduced? Do they make the game more fair or fun, with more interesting openings? Someone enlighten me.
I would really appreciate it if you guys could tell me your preferred setup compared to the others and your arguments for why.