I had 140 or smth like this, as far as I remember maybe 120 been displayed only
Actually they sorted already the same way by remaining time you are going to do.... there is nothing to improve...actually if it will be only 25 or 50 games how player can make a needed move if his opponent is 51st in the lust... at least you should make possibility each player to decide how many games he or she wants to be displayed
Thanks adriano81!
For the potential problem you mention... in order to get to, say, the 51st game in your list, all you would need to do is make a move in any of the earlier games... but I think I see what you are saying: In cases where you wish to ignore games (that have less remaining time) to play vs a specific opponent, the liklihood of inconvenience increases as the number of allowable/visible games gets lower.
To be clear, the reason we're concerned about this has to do with some new features that may be challenged by very large numbers of active games... Anyway, good point. :)
Hi there,
Looking for insight from users who play a LARGE number of echess games at once, specifically related to related experience with the iOS app. Have you played over 50 games (over 100 games??) at once, and used the app with this many games going?
If so, what was it like?
To avoid memory/performance issues, we're thinking of introducing a cap, so that when you refresh your game list you would see only the "top" 25 or 50 games, sorted first by your time remaining to move.
Cheers!