Most of them but yes
Why do most people think the Two Towers movie is better than the Fellowship of the Ring movie?

Ok
I am going to give you a schooling
in the names of the LOTR
I will spell this in all lowercase
to show you how it works
ioreth

@jdh1, they leave out huge gaps and add dumb stuff
Let me give you some examples
Tom Bombadil-left out
The Scouring of the shire-left out
For some weird reason, all of Rohan goes to Helm's deep. In the book, the warriors go there, and the women and Children go to Dunharrow-add
Faramir takes Frodo to Osgiliath, with the intent of taking the ring to Minas Tirith-add
Boromir and Faramir both have blond hair in the movie, while they have dark hair in the book (Minute detail, but I noticed and it bugs me)
In the book, the army of the Dead only go to the attack the Corsairs of Umbar, and then leave. In the movie, they just go and attack on the field of Pellenor-add
At the entrance to Mordor, Frodo sends Sam away for 'eating' all the lembas waybread. In the book, nothing of the sort happens.-add
In the movie, Pippin and Merry at first fail to convince Treebeard and the Ents to go to Isengard, but in the book, they convinced them practically right away. -left out
In the movie, they leave the Shire like in a day, but in the book it's literal years.-left out
I could go on. And on. And on and on and on.
Ok, yes, so it's slightly inconsistent. But a way better adaptation than many other films. Some of it is kinda tricky to transfer.
One thing that bothers me is that in Gondor all the woman and children are still there during the attack while in the book all of them left to a safe place