what i always thought those positions were drawn
Wow you learn something new every day!!!!

well i did too
Black has another way to draw, based on having his king on f5, playing f6, and then running to h3.

did you know that in this position (white to move) white can force a win? previously, the position was thought to be drawn. But German grandmaster Steckner proved it was winning for white in 2003 (Recent!) !!
while in this position (black to move, Dautov)
he can force a draw?
With white to move, he wins with 1. Kd4! With complications that you won't see even in the najdorf and dragon combined. 1...Rxf2 2.Kc4!! (2.Kc5 draws, but I don't know why!)
While with black to move, he draws with 1...Ra4!! 2.Kd3 g5!!
And in the end, black reaches this position (white to move):
If you shifted the rook and black king one file to the right, white would be winning! But black draws because his king is close enough by one tempo.
I have to study this stuff a bit more.
ok this is crazy stuff
I know the ending is drawn because for rook pawn lucena the enemy king has to be cut off by three or more files but to get to that position is... hard
I've recently decided to specialize in winning opposite colored bishops endgames after looking at a few insane wins

This is actually insane and probably fundamentally changes how we look at such endgames up a pawn
Still would take really high skill to convert though
Although (human) opponent wouldn't necessarily play perfectly

the trouble with endgames though is you need to calculate insanely deep to win
which is possible since they're not as complex (most of the time) but still
hi this endgame is basically borderline winning for white

Or rather
In endgame the material is reduced enough you can calculate with a variable amount of certanity whether a line absolutely wins, loses, or draws

the trouble with endgames though is you need to calculate insanely deep to win
which is possible since they're not as complex (most of the time) but still
hi this endgame is basically borderline winning for white
I could do an entire lesson on this one position, in the book I have the author took thirty pages to explain

the trouble with endgames though is you need to calculate insanely deep to win
which is possible since they're not as complex (most of the time) but still
hi this endgame is basically borderline winning for white
I could do an entire lesson on this one position, in the book I have the author took thirty pages to explain
After reading this post I realized I knew absolutely 0 about endgames OR chess
And thus why we aren't 2000
Because we just play mindlessly without actually learning ig

the trouble with endgames though is you need to calculate insanely deep to win
which is possible since they're not as complex (most of the time) but still
hi this endgame is basically borderline winning for white
I could do an entire lesson on this one position, in the book I have the author took thirty pages to explain
After reading this post I realized I knew absolutely 0 about endgames OR chess
And thus why we aren't 2000
Because we just play mindlessly without actually learning ig
I thought I was good at endgames until yesterday when I read the chapter on this position
then i realized i was dog

the trouble with endgames though is you need to calculate insanely deep to win
which is possible since they're not as complex (most of the time) but still
hi this endgame is basically borderline winning for white
I could do an entire lesson on this one position, in the book I have the author took thirty pages to explain
After reading this post I realized I knew absolutely 0 about endgames OR chess
And thus why we aren't 2000
Because we just play mindlessly without actually learning ig
I thought I was good at endgames until yesterday when I read the chapter on this position
then i realized i was dog
And then you realize I've actually never seriously studied endgames
Just intuition and puzzles
Now we wonder why I fail to convert materially balanced endgames that are winning (like that game you annotated for me)

Oh what I thought that was a draw
so did everyone else up to grandmaster level until 2003

actually I think even if the black king's planted on d7 white wins with bxe6! deflecting the king and letting white's king support the a-pawn which forces black to trade of his bishop for it
then the k+p endgame is easily winning because e5 and it's a protected passer while black can't make a passer of his own
the best winning plan is pushing e5, then f5. This gives white a passed e pawn, which he uses to deflect the black king so that he can run to the queenside. After winning the bishop for he a pawn, black is LOSING because he has both g and h pawns. If one of them were gone, the position would be drawn.
did you know that in this position (white to move) white can force a win? previously, the position was thought to be drawn. But German grandmaster Steckner proved it was winning for white in 2003 (Recent!) !!
while in this position (black to move, Dautov)
he can force a draw?
With white to move, he wins with 1. Kd4! With complications that you won't see even in the najdorf and dragon combined. 1...Rxf2 2.Kc4!! (2.Kc5 draws, but I don't know why!)
While with black to move, he draws with 1...Ra4!! 2.Kd3 g5!!
And in the end, black reaches this position (white to move):
If you shifted the rook and black king one file to the right, white would be winning! But black draws because his king is close enough by one tempo.
I have to study this stuff a bit more.