nubs

Sort:
TheGiftOfCheckmate

.

i-is-a-shape

ight pro

why-does-we-exist
chapakazi wrote:

What the hell 300 rated noobs (ik you think I am a noob cuz I have low rate but I got banned)

that 696 rapid rating is looking on point

CounterproductiveHam
Free-de-la-hoy2 wrote:
Rating never matters.our thinking capacity matters,basically I’m a 1200 rated player even I do blunders,mistakes.today I played a game ,fortunately I won that game when I saw accuracy it was 96.2 I was shocked,I swear I didn’t use engine.suddenly my brain went insane I think so.byw I got one inaccuracy lol.so sometimes our brains don’t think much,sometimes it’s thinking level goes insane,THEREFORE rating doesn’t matter.

Thats low by most standards(1200, I mean), 96.2 is low for an engine if you used an engine(which you don't), and chess.com is increasing accuracy rating maybe

why-does-we-exist
Free-de-la-hoy2 wrote:
Rating never matters.our thinking capacity matters,basically I’m a 1200 rated player even I do blunders,mistakes.today I played a game ,fortunately I won that game when I saw accuracy it was 96.2 I was shocked,I swear I didn’t use engine.suddenly my brain went insane I think so.byw I got one inaccuracy lol.so sometimes our brains don’t think much,sometimes it’s thinking level goes insane,THEREFORE rating doesn’t matter.

well, how often your thinking level goes "insane" affects your rating

dah_happyh0ppyh0rsi3

Lol at least 400 points overrated

dah_happyh0ppyh0rsi3

Imaoooo

TheGiftOfCheckmate

omg i was like 10 lol.

sndeww
TheGiftOfCheckmate wrote:

omg i was like 10 lol.

skull