Why do you look closely at under 400 games?
Playing "CHESS" as an under-400 ELO
Sort:
JourneyTo2500Rapid wrote:
Okay guys look this isn't gonna help anyone anymore idrinkyourhealth3 is never gonna listen to what you have to say anway so this is really just useless spam now
I am listening
AnswerZone wrote:
Why does this matter so much anymore??? Just put your opinion and like reply to a few people mate. Idrinkhealth is like changing sides to get his point across without looking like a villain, and everyone else is against him, and its a bunch of spam man .
I am trying to reply to everyone. I am not against anybody, I'm against the lies
Nov 15, 2025
0
#165
Quite frankly, the fact that barely any <400 ELO players know how to checkmate with a queen and a king without promoting a pawn is ridiculous, let alone a rook and king checkmate.
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
AnswerZone wrote:
Why does this matter so much anymore??? Just put your opinion and like reply to a few people mate. Idrinkhealth is like changing sides to get his point across without looking like a villain, and everyone else is against him, and its a bunch of spam man .
I am trying to reply to everyone. I am not against anybody, I'm against the lies
Oh I see,... sorry
Nov 15, 2025
0
#167
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
Nov 15, 2025
0
#168
qjud wrote:
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
Why play against people under 400 if it bothers you so much? I swear, you guys are so delicate.
Nov 15, 2025
0
#169
nicosnake14 wrote:
Quite frankly, the fact that barely any <400 ELO players know how to checkmate with a queen and a king without promoting a pawn is ridiculous, let alone a rook and king checkmate.
How do you know what players below 400 do?
Nov 15, 2025
0
#170
Vacuum-Tube wrote:
nicosnake14 wrote:
Quite frankly, the fact that barely any <400 ELO players know how to checkmate with a queen and a king without promoting a pawn is ridiculous, let alone a rook and king checkmate.
How do you know what players below 400 do?
Because he's barely above there
qjud wrote:
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
how do you know their real age ?
Nov 16, 2025
0
#173
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
qjud wrote:
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
how do you know their real age ?
Hey I am 10 and I am 1567 OTB.And here are a few people (not listing names, only titles and age.) from my state.
NM-11
FM-11
CM-12
CM-12
( I am sure we all have heard about Abimanyu Mishra)
Nov 16, 2025
0
#174
As someone who has a bullet rating around 400 elo, I will say the most strategic playing I've seen is making random moves fast to beat me in time.
iPlayChess610 wrote:
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
qjud wrote:
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
how do you know their real age ?
Hey I am 10 and I am 1567 OTB.And here are a few people (not listing names, only titles and age.) from my state.
NM-11
FM-11
CM-12
CM-12
( I am sure we all have heard about Abimanyu Mishra)
Wow.... chess is crazy... CM at 12 is crazy (I mean, even having a title at 12 is crazy...)
iPlayChess610 wrote:
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
qjud wrote:
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
how do you know their real age ?
Hey I am 10 and I am 1567 OTB.And here are a few people (not listing names, only titles and age.) from my state.
NM-11
FM-11
CM-12
CM-12
( I am sure we all have heard about Abimanyu Mishra)
That is less than 1% and definetely doesn't answer my question
Hameschess wrote:
As someone who has a bullet rating around 400 elo, I will say the most strategic playing I've seen is making random moves fast to beat me in time.
Using the time in their favour IS a completely 100% legit strategy, can't see anything wrong with it
iPlayChess610 wrote:
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
qjud wrote:
When i play against people under 400, They often fall for dumbest traps… most of them are new beginner or kids with 7-11 years old. (mostly)
how do you know their real age ?
Hey I am 10 and I am 1567 OTB.And here are a few people (not listing names, only titles and age.) from my state.
NM-11
FM-11
CM-12
CM-12
( I am sure we all have heard about Abimanyu Mishra)
you can stop glazing yourself and go back to losing your pisslow elo games
Nov 16, 2025
0
#179
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
JourneyTo2500Rapid wrote:
Okay guys look this isn't gonna help anyone anymore idrinkyourhealth3 is never gonna listen to what you have to say anway so this is really just useless spam now
I am listening
You're not really, you're reading the comments and then throwing your perspective in their face
> He doesn't approve... so its annoying for him...
Who?
I was talking about @MaestroDelAjedrez2025 , but I think it wouldn't be wrong to say its aplicable to almost everybody
Why isn't it also applicable to you?