Chess Mini - Smallest engine in the world

Sort:
qfinance

Please try the smallest chess engine in the world:

 

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/chess-mini/id616424231?mt=8

 

 

Irontiger

It looks like it's the "smallest" in the meaning of "shortest source code", from your link. I believe quite a few softwares have already been working on iPhones and stuff.

qfinance

Do you mean chess softwares for iPhone? There're literally hundreds and hundreds candidates, not just "quite a few". The smallest is of course refers to the size of the engine, not the overall size of the download.

Tronchenbiais

How strong is it ? I am very curious.

EscherehcsE

Chess Mini actually uses Harm Muller's micro-Max engine. Probably near 2000 elo.

http://home.hccnet.nl/h.g.muller/max-src2.html

Tronchenbiais

That's cool !

Irontiger
andywongchess wrote:

The smallest is of course refers to the size of the engine, not the overall size of the download.

Well, I thought "engine" refers to the physical device, not to the code inside it.

So I thought from the title you were showing me my way to an easy 2500 rating, but apparently I just misread it.

qfinance

Yes. The engine is about 2000 and can actually beat you if you're not careful. While it doesn't blunder, it plays unsound positional moves. You just need to restrain yourself from losing a piece, then you'll win.

qfinance

Chess engine usually refers to the actual piece of code for calculating moves and performing search. Micro-Max only counts the materials. It knows nothing about isolated pawn, for example. If you want to beat a chess engine in full strength, Micro-Max is best possible candidate.

EscherehcsE
andywongchess wrote:

If you want to beat a chess engine in full strength, Micro-Max is best possible candidate.

Well, there are lots of amateur engines that are rated much lower than micro-Max.

qfinance

True. But they don't provide better experience when playing against a human. You don't want an engine that is too weak and drop a piece to you for nothing. Micro-Max doesn't bluder, it doesn't lose any material to you without some inputs from you. You really need to do some works for your win. It's very hard to find a good engine rated below Elo 2200 because a standard chess algorithm can easily push the strength over 2200.

EscherehcsE
andywongchess wrote:

True. But they don't provide better experience when playing against a human. You don't want an engine that is too weak and drop a piece to you for nothing. Micro-Max doesn't bluder, it doesn't lose any material to you without some inputs from you. You really need to do some works for your win. It's very hard to find a good engine rated below Elo 2200 because a standard chess algorithm can easily push the strength over 2200.

You seem to forget (or not be aware) that many people will never be able to beat a 2000 elo engine, ever. Tongue Out

Ziggyblitz

Chess-mini provides a real fun challenge. I play it at 5 secs per move and it usually wins. My favourite chess engine app .

Irrawong

Two other candidates are Turing’s Machine and Primus both of which have no opening book.  Both provide a similar playing experience to Chess Mini, but Chess Mini has plenty of opening variety.

essmanchay
Thank you @ted_wong! Sounds interesting. I will check it out!