What You Need to Know to Break 1000 and Where to Learn It

Sort:
1001Smites
In my previous post I suggested books that help you reduce the frequency of hanging pieces, introduced you to Tactics, and Opening Principles. I also spoke about the importance of analyzing your games, with the help of a computer to identify your mistakes. It is important that you categorize your mistakes, and thus identify where you need to improve most.
At this level Discovering Chess Openings by John Emms is very good at helping you play the Opening correctly I am currently going through this book for the second time.

The truth is that almost every game you have every played and ever will play until your ranking is considerably higher has been or will be won or lost by tactics. At this level how good you are at chess is mostly a reflection of how good you are at tactics.
Winning Chess: How to See Three Moves Ahead by Irving Chernev is the best book for making rapid improvements in your tactical ability. This book is organized by tactical motif and does teach you how to see 3 moves ahead. If you can master this skill ( seeing 3 moves ahead) you will become a Titan of Tactics your ranking will go up, and at times you will be amazed at how little most players see at this level. I personally believe that mastering the knowledge in this book will do more to improve your chess than any other book. the draw back is that it is in descriptive notation. But the good news is that since it is tactics it is not too hard to follow. Get this book, yes you have to buy it used. Learn descriptive notation and become a Titan of Tactics!

A lot of people on this site will tell you that beginners need to study end games. I agree, however the studying I am talking about is solving checkmate puzzles. It is very important that you learn to recognize checkmate patterns. At first you should solve mates in one puzzles, and then mates in two. Chess: 5334 Problems Combination and Games in my mind is the best book for this. I went through the mates in one twice. After which I could solve most of the problems on site or with in a few seconds. Solving the mates in two is considerably harder, but what do you need to solve a mate in two? You need to be able to see three move ahead! Solving mates in two will help you master the material in Winning Chess: How to See Three Moves Ahead, and is a great way to practice what you learn.

The above two books on tactics have added 200 points to my rating, and I believe that I am one of the better traction at my level. Yes I still lose games, yes I still make mistakes. But I am still working at becoming a master at always looking 3 moves ahead. But I can tell by the moves that my opponents make I am one of the few people at my level who does try and look 3 moves ahead.
GodsPawn2016

The basics of each phase of the game

 

Opening:

Follow the Opening principles:

  1. Control the center squares – d4-e4-d5-e5

  2. Develop your minor pieces toward the center – piece activity is the key

  • Complete your development before moving a piece twice or starting an attack.

  • Move pieces not pawns.

  1. Castle

  2. Connect your rooks

  • By move 12, you should have connected your Rooks, or be about to do so.

 

Middle game:

When you have completed the Opening Principles, you are now at the middle game. Now you need to formulate a middle game plan. The middle game is a very complicated part of a chess game. A simple way to develop a middle game plan is to perform the following steps.

  1. Scan your opponents 5th, and 6th ranks (3rd, and 4th if your black)

  2. Look for weak pawns, and or weak squares.

  • Weak pawns and squares are Pawns, and squares that cannot be defended by another Pawn.

  • Knights are excellent pieces on weak squares.

  • When deciding on weak squares, and weak Pawns to attack, the closer to the center the better

 

End game:

Start with the basics:

  1. Learn basic mates – KQ vs. K, KR vs. K, KRR vs. K

  2. Learn Opposition, and Key Squares

  3. Learn basic King and Pawn endings

 

Pre Move Checklist:

 

1. Make sure all your pieces are safe.

2. Look for forcing move: Checks, captures, threats. You want to look at ALL forcing moves (even the bad ones) this will force you look at, and see the entire board.

3. If there are no forcing moves, you then want to remove any of your opponent’s pieces from your side of the board.

4. If your opponent doesn’t have any of his pieces on your side of the board, then you want to improve the position of your least active piece.

 

5. After each move by your opponent. Ask yourself: “What is my opponent trying to do?”

RussBell

 Suggestions for those looking to improve... 

https://www.chess.com/article/view/study-plan-directory

https://www.chess.com/news/view/introduction-to-positional-chess-planning-amp-strategy-2860

also...

Good Chess Books for Beginners and Beyond...

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-equipment/good-chess-books-for-beginners-and-beyond

 

ActuallySleepy
Please read posts before posting spam.
RussBell
AlkinKing wrote:
Please read posts before posting spam.

drop dead...

ActuallySleepy
Keeping my fingers crossed.
CookedQueen
RussBell wrote:
AlkinKing wrote:
Please read posts before posting spam.

drop dead...

The topic opener had so much effort typing all this on his 3" mobile phone and as a result he gets drop dead?

kindaspongey

Possibly of interest:
Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
https://www.newinchess.com/Shop/Images/Pdfs/7192.pdf
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1949)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
Discovering Chess Openings by GM John Emms (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/excerpts/OpeningsForAmateurs%20sample.pdf
Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Chess_Endgames_for_Kids.pdf
A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Seirawan stuff
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm

dannyhume
I think tactics (without endgames, strategy, or openings, principles or variations) can get one to 1200. Michael de la Maza might argue to 1900 or so.

The Polgar 5334 mates-in-2's are:
1) roughly 1300 typical middlegame-type attack mates (1. check [opponent responds] 2. checkmate) and
2) roughly 2100 composed mates in 2.

The composed mates in 2 are much more difficult, with the first move never a check, many pieces or squares to choose from to make the first "quiet" move, often against a king on an open board (many squares to run to and opponent responses to analyze). Convekta has a program called Mate Studies that has composed mates-in-2'a and they rate these problems at the 1750 level. I think these are good training for early strategy/controlling squares/space.

RussBell is not a spammer.
RussBell
dannyhume wrote:
I think tactics (without endgames, strategy, or openings, principles or variations) can get one to 1200. Michael de la Maza might argue to 1900 or so.

The Polgar 5334 mates-in-2's are:
1) roughly 1300 typical middlegame-type attack mates (1. check [opponent responds] 2. checkmate) and
2) roughly 2100 composed mates in 2.

The composed mates in 2 are much more difficult, with the first move never a check, many pieces or squares to choose from to make the first "quiet" move, often against a king on an open board (many squares to run to and opponent responses to analyze). Convekta has a program called Mate Studies that has composed mates-in-2'a and they rate these problems at the 1750 level. I think these are good training for early strategy/controlling squares/space.

RussBell is not a spammer.

Thanks Danny....

ActuallySleepy
I don't know you Russ but I see godspawn post this same thing on every improvement thread I've read. And imo it seemed op was sharing material that got him over 1000, but idk maybe he was looking for others to add advice as well.
RussBell
AlkinKing wrote:
I don't know you Russ but I see godspawn post this same thing on every improvement thread I've read. And imo it seemed op was sharing material that got him over 1000, but idk maybe he was looking for others to add advice as well.

My intention was to be positive and helpful.  It seems to me your preference is to be negative and judgemental.  I don't know you either.  Neither do I wish to.

cashscoggin

i agree

 

Ziryab

I agree with the OP that tactics are the primary skill needed, and also that checkmate patterns are a good place to begin. I also share some enthusiasm for Laszlo Polgar, Chess in 5334 Positions. However, I would not list this book among the top five on the subject. The overall structure of the book is good, starting with hundreds of mate in ones, then thousands of mate in twos, and then a healthy dose of mate in three. The back of the book with 600 miniatures arranged by the square on which a sacrifice occurs may the the best part of the book. I spent many hours working through this book, but stalled before I reached problem number 2000. I was USCF 1500 at the time (that is, about 800 higher than 1000 on this site). At that point in the book, the mates in two start with a quiet move, the enemy king is in the middle of the board, and your checkmate uses minor pieces in conjunction with a queen or rook and also your king plays a role. You will learn a lot about piece coordination solving these, but you may also grow frustrated. Here’s some examples: http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2022/03/jazz.html

For learning checkmates, three books stand head and shoulders above the rest. These are Georges Renaud and Victor Kahn, The Art of the Checkmate; Victor Henkin, Checkmate in 1000 Combinations; and Antonio Gude, Fundamental Checkmates.

Renaud and Kahn present a limited number of basic patterns, show each pattern in its barest form, and then present game fragments and whole games where that pattern ended the game, as well as games where that pattern was averted, usually at great cost. They add quizzes. I find the book both accessible and instructive. When I first read it nearly 25 years ago, my game instantly improved. This article discusses Renaud and Kahn in more detail: http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2021/11/learning-checkmate-or-teaching-it.html

Henkin organizes his book by the piece giving checkmate. The book is richer and more challenging than Renaud and Kahn. The difference in approach also makes the two complementary. Henkin’s book offers far more study material. There are two English translations of Henkin’s work, which originally appeared in Russian. 1000 Checkmate Combinations is the newer and better edition. This article compares the two versions, as well as another checkmate pattern book from the late 1970s: http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2022/02/two-old-books-and-one-new.html

Gude combines both approaches and offers an excellent primer on the simplest checkmates as well. If you were to have only one book on checkmates, Gude’s is the one you want. 

The app by Chess King, CT-ART: Mating Combinations, is Henkin’s book.

SpanishStallion

Also, it is important to establish if the 1000 elo is online or over the board. For example, in blitz I am 1701 on Chess.com, 2000 on Lichess and 1940 in Fide rating.