18055 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The latest course could do with proof reading.
cleans for queens
when for win
yeah the hints aren't very helpful either
ExtraBold, can you please provide me with a list of the errors you found throughout the course (such as the lesson name and position where the error is). Once I have this information I will be happy to make the appropriate corrections for this Chess Mentor course. Thank you for your help.
I've only got to number 4 and they were everywhere in that one. ISTR some in 1-3.
Ok, I have gone through and tried to clean up most of the errors in the course. If anyone finds more corrections that need to be made please let me know.
Patzer24, I just finished the entire Chess Mentor course this year and now I am going through it again. I have noticed some typo's, do you want me to email youwhen I find one?
You can message me any typos that you find. Much appreciated!
Intro - Materially, white is down a piece in the black has time to develop he is sure to prevail.
Later - White has only two points with a Rook, and no direct attack on the King, but black is already in a very difficult position. [two pawns for a rook?]
Later - Sets up a discovered check. [No - sets up a check with discovered attack on the queen]
Thanks ExtraBold. These mistakes have been fixed. Although the last one I believe is meant to still be "discovered check".
It was a white queen move to the 4th rank, so that when the white bishop moved with check, the black queen on the 4th rank would be attacked by the white queen.
This isn't a discovered check, because it is the discovering piece not the discovered piece that will give check.
Right, this has also been adjusted.
Why do people get so mad when you don't wanna rematch?
by robcameron a few minutes ago
Your games shallowly and pessimistically analyzed by some guy.
by Diakonia 4 minutes ago
I want to know the truth about Colorado gambit(aka Fred)
by pfren 5 minutes ago
mate in 4 moves hard
by TheEinari 9 minutes ago
5/27/2016 - Straight Checks
by BlargDragon 10 minutes ago
Help Analyzing Unusual Variation of Slav Defense
by AstrAGiurgiu 17 minutes ago
This is not Sharp, this is Yisus Craist (Najdorf)
by RandomBean 17 minutes ago
Why play the Colle?
by DoctorKraken42 17 minutes ago
Offering a Draw or Accepting a Draw
by Thmsnsh 25 minutes ago
Number of games with one person
by BlargDragon 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!