Rating on Chess Mentor

Sort:
naturalproduct

Hi Everyone:

 

First, thanks for looking at my post. I am brand new to chess. I played my first computer game about a week ago trying to figure out how the pieces move. I then started becomming hooked a few days later. I have a question on the rating system in Chess mentor. First, I have no idea what ratings mean. In the chess mentor it says my rating is

Current: 1513

Lowest: 1100

Can someone give me an idea if this is bad, average or better than average for someone who just started playing a week ago?

 

Thanks,

 

Mike

Scottrf

You can't judge anything from chess mentor rating, it depends entirely on what courses you've attempted I think, some seem to be more generous than others. Also, you start on quite a high rating so it might not be stable.

naturalproduct

I studied 15 lessons so far and played the computer several times. I just wish I knew where I stood.I did the following:

AKO020 The Weakest Square Attacks 1500 22%
AKO064 King's Indian Defense: 4 Pawns Attack Openings 1600 73%
WCT034 Lasker-Tarrasch, Dusseldorf 1908 Games 1500 38%
WFI019 Lesson 19 Tactics 1500 67%
WFN025 Lesson 25 Tactics 1500 74%
PEB086 Pawn endings: Related Squares Endgames 1500 81%
TDZ017 Shouldering Endgames 1400 95%
STT093 Christiansen-Bonin, New York 1990 Tactics 1500 58%
AKO076 Nimzo-Indian Defense: 4.Qc2 Openings 1400 60%
EOT007 Basic Mate: King, Bishop and Knight vs. King Endgames 1400 55%
ROE082 Rook and Rook-pawn on seventh vs. Rook Endgames 1400 77%
S005 Don't panic! Misc 1400 65%
BYT081 Opening of a File, Rank, or Diagonal Tactics 1300 87%
ROE089 Passive Rook, pawn on seventh and f-pawn vs. Rook Endgames 1300 100%
ECP066 Damiano's Bishop Mate Tactics 1100 86%
Scottrf

I would say if you're new and understanding that many lessons, then that's great. But I wouldn't read too much into your rating.

Sometimes you can score 100% even when taking hints, sometimes you will lose points for clicking 'key squares' even when it tells you to.

Just focus on if you're understanding it.

You're new to chess? Some of those lessons seem pretty advanced.

naturalproduct

Yes; however, take my time thinking my moves through (and counter moves) before I move a piece.  I love it. It seems to be more than a game to me, almost an art.

The last lesson I played seemed very difficult to me. I dont think I did well.

Scottrf

Impressive, there aren't that many who can do the bishop/knight mate.

blerkoid

Just to add to the topic a bit - I am a 900'ish rated player and my chess mentor rating is about 1400 or so. It is a lie! lol

Makes me feel like there is hope for me yet, though.

naturalproduct
blerkoid wrote:

Just to add to the topic a bit - I am a 900'ish rated player and my chess mentor rating is about 1400 or so. It is a lie! lol

Makes me feel like there is hope for me yet, though.

Blerkoid:

How did you find out your rating was 900? Does this come from playing online?

MoonlessNight

Chess mentor ratings are NOT related at all to other ratings. I know a guy who has a 2200 Mentor rating, and a 1400 USCF rating

blerkoid

Yes naturalproduct - my rating online is in the 900's. I also have other chess training software that tells me that my rating is that low too lol.

baddogno

Chess Mentor ratings are still inflated, although not as bad as they used to be.  A year and a half or so ago they changed the system because patzers like me had ratings in the 2000's.  Now I'm 1800 something which is still hundreds of points high but no longer ludicrous.

RML11

Greetings, first forum post. I became a Premuim member fairly recently and am enjoying Chess Mentor. It seems from comments here the rating can be a bit suspect, which I tend to agree. I like to review the lessons and at the end I get told I have got "100%", when my non-review attempt was much less usually. I have "attained" an unusually high rating of over 1700 in Chess Mentor, which I simply am nowhere near in standard. Just a comment and I will disregard the ranking score and concentrate on the learning. Cheers all.