bvump
1.d4 refuted...?
Sort:
Sep 2, 2015
0
#123
Irontiger wrote:
dmvdc wrote:
schlechter55 wrote:
there are whole books written about 1.d4 c5. this alone puts the rigorous claim that 1....c5 would be a 'mistake', in doubt.
Hardly. I take no position on 1.d4 c5, whether it's good, bad, ugly, refuted, or sound. But whole books being written about something in chess reflects absolutely nothing about the topic. It just means someone needed a payday.
Yep. I didn't need to search a source very far : http://www.amazon.com/Challenging-Sicilian-With-Repertoire-Books/dp/9548782375
""""
Only costs $117 per copy. USED!
bump
Bump
bvump