Forums

2Kdefence - is this move good

Sort:
RMadness

Hi!

Today I was playing a game and my opponent chose to exchange his knight and bishop against my pawn and rook. I personally never do that. Is this move considered good?

Ghostqiuyu

Not good in THIS position

RMadness

Thanks, Ghostqiuyu! Can you tell me why? Because white is now back in development as he has changed his active knight and bishop against my inactive rook?

Ghostqiuyu

yeah,a little bit like that.Black has he's pieces more developted than white.you can play e6,Be6,Qd7,Kg8,Rf8 and you're king is safe.you have the f-column.Or you can play d5 to have the center but it's a little bit dangerous because of you're king.An exchange of R vs. B-N-P is not good for white.

I think it's that...

snoopy1234567

It usually isnt good to trade 2 minor pieces for a rook and a pawn

so it isnt in this case

2 minor pieces are usually worth R+2P 

2 bishops worth more than R+2P

RG1951

        I thought the usually accepted values were pawn - 1, knight/bishop - 3 and rook - 5. Obviously, these are only a guide.

HaveAnotherGame

This is a tempting exchange sacrifice because the points are the same (Rook + Pawn vs Bishop + Knight) But because of the somewhat slow and weak pawn, the trade isn't really even. The trade is basically just the Rook alone for the Knight and Bishop. If Black plays accurately enough, he should have an easy win.

Ohhh and lines to follow could be Qf3, Nc3, or c3, or c4.

batgirl
chessmicky wrote:

Actually, if I didn't know any theory, I would almost surely play 5.Nxf7, as the twelve-year old Bobby Fischer did!

You'd initiate the Traxler.

mkkuhner

When people play things like this they often hope the Black king will be unsafe, but here he looks fine to me--just one move at some point to get back to g8 and he might as well be castled.  Also it's not terribly easy for White to get in d4.  Black has squares for all of his pieces and no pawn weaknesses.  I'd much rather have Black.

HaveAnotherGame

To win this with White, try to simplify the position by trading off pieces. Push for an endgame. Try to strive for a Rook vs. Bishop or Knight Endgame. To win with Black, he needs to keep his pieces on the board. He captured 2 in exchange for 1. The pawn that was captured wasn't going to serve much purpose besides protecting the castled King. I agree with mkkuhner once Black restores his King, the game shows a slight edge for Black.

ThrillerFan

To stereotype that you never trade 2 Pieces for Rook and Pawn is a huge mistake.

Statistically speaking, the two pieces are better than the rook and pawn far more often than the other way around, but to flat out say that you never do it (barring checkmate) is a mistake.  I have won many games with the Rook and Pawn.

That said, the whole opening line you give is botched by both sides.  Black's 4th move is extremely dubious, and White's 5th move is a complete and utter joke!



HaveAnotherGame

Thriller made good point white was already winning.

HaveAnotherGame

I'm not entirely sure if I understand? Could you please elaborate what you mean by and I quote, "Maybe mot if the play Nf7 ... Laughing"

HaveAnotherGame

Thanks IM pfren. I get it now. 

ThrillerFan
pfren wrote:
HaveAnotherGame wrote:

I'm not entirely sure if I understand? Could you please elaborate what you mean by and I quote, "Maybe mot if the play Nf7 ... "

It means that the above analysis is ridiculous.

 

Ehm... mr ThrillerFan,

the authority of the ignorant is the most dangerous one.

After 5.Nxf7(?) Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2?! Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 9.Nxh8 Black could (and should) play 9...Nd4, when white has to take on g3 and allow a perpetual.

6.  Kf1 is of course better, but Black has strong counterplay. After 6...Qe7 7.Nxh8 d5 8.ed5 "with a clear advantage to white", care to say where this advantage is after 8...Nd4 9.d6 Qxd6 10.Nf7 Qe7! or you prefer keeping the "secret" locally?

FYI the position has been exhaustively analysed, and Black apparently stands fine.  You can find the analysis at Chesspub, no need to plagiarize it here.

White does have an advantage in the Traxler, just not with 5.Nxf7.

Not keeping any secrets.  Your 10th move for both players is incorrect in your line with 6.Kf1.  After 10.Nf7?, 10...Qc5! gives Black chances.

Instead, 10.c3! and now 10...Qc6 11.cxd4 Qxc4+ 12.Kxf2 Qxd4+ 13.Ke1! Bg4 14.Qb3 O-O-O 15.Nc3 Ne4 16.Nxe4 Qxe4+ 17.Qe3 Qxe3+ (17...Qxg2?? 18.Rg1 +-) 18.dxe3 Rd1+ 19.Kf2 Rxh1 20.Nf7 Bf5 21.Nxe5 Rxh2 22.Nf3 +- and White's up a piece in the endgame.

varelse1

bongcloudftw wrote:

One must wonder why white didn't take with the bishop on move 5...

I believe there is a deadly crapload of theory if white plays nxf7!!??

And yeah, I would agree with chessmicky that black is close to winning here.

.

White can get checkmated fast in the Traxler, if he doesn't know the lines. Black's attack is much more dangerous than it looks.

913Glorax12

I shall!

RubiksRevenge
ThrillerFan wrote:
pfren wrote:
HaveAnotherGame wrote:

I'm not entirely sure if I understand? Could you please elaborate what you mean by and I quote, "Maybe mot if the play Nf7 ... "

It means that the above analysis is ridiculous.

 

Ehm... mr ThrillerFan,

the authority of the ignorant is the most dangerous one.

After 5.Nxf7(?) Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2?! Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 9.Nxh8 Black could (and should) play 9...Nd4, when white has to take on g3 and allow a perpetual.

6.  Kf1 is of course better, but Black has strong counterplay. After 6...Qe7 7.Nxh8 d5 8.ed5 "with a clear advantage to white", care to say where this advantage is after 8...Nd4 9.d6 Qxd6 10.Nf7 Qe7! or you prefer keeping the "secret" locally?

FYI the position has been exhaustively analysed, and Black apparently stands fine.  You can find the analysis at Chesspub, no need to plagiarize it here.

White does have an advantage in the Traxler, just not with 5.Nxf7.

Not keeping any secrets.  Your 10th move for both players is incorrect in your line with 6.Kf1.  After 10.Nf7?, 10...Qc5! gives Black chances.

Instead, 10.c3! and now 10...Qc6 11.cxd4 Qxc4+ 12.Kxf2 Qxd4+ 13.Ke1! Bg4 14.Qb3 O-O-O 15.Nc3 Ne4 16.Nxe4 Qxe4+ 17.Qe3 Qxe3+ (17...Qxg2?? 18.Rg1 +-) 18.dxe3 Rd1+ 19.Kf2 Rxh1 20.Nf7 Bf5 21.Nxe5 Rxh2 22.Nf3 +- and White's up a piece in the endgame.

I followed the line up to "Instead, 10.c3!" but don't see that 10..Qc6 is necessary. Does 10..Bg4 do any better? I must admit that I don't like these messy positions and would avoid it from any side if I was playing in an OTB game. It seems to me that Black is always struggling in the Traxler and has to bail out with perpetual in many lines so using the Traxler as main defence to 4.Ng5 seems bad when you will face lower rated players that could be happy for draw. And even lines that White is playing for a win seem to be hard for black with wierd material imbalances which on surface favour White.

913Glorax12

Here you go pfren, this one is for you:

jonathanbeatty

chessmicky wrote:

Actually, if I didn't know any theory, I would almost surely play 5.Nxf7, as the twelve-year old Bobby Fischer did!

The Traxler is devastating if you don't know the lines at all. it can be very bad for White if he is unprepared.