That's not true, Hikaru Nakamura is a top standard chess player and the best bullet player in the world. All the best bullet players are titled players because if you are good at bullet you are good at chess. So too if an opining works in bullet it works in standard.
3. Qxf7+: New opining novelty that always wins
Sort:
@elo123 let's get into Live Chess right now and you try to beat me at it with this joke of a sacrifice. I've won most games where the opponent is foolish enough to do something like that.
Basically, at my level (rating), let alone Nakamura's, your idea doesn't fly.
fireflashghost wrote:
elo123 wrote:
That's not true, Hikaru Nakamura is a top standard chess player and the best bullet player in the world. All the best bullet players are titled players because if you are good at bullet you are good at chess. So too if an opining works in bullet it works in standard.
In bullet, you barely have any time to think about making a move if you hope to win a game. Obviously, you'll be able to get away with much more bad stuff if your opponent doesn't see it. If anything, your statement is the opposite of the truth when comparing bullet chess to standard chess (and chess in general).
Personally I find bullet chess far more tactical than slower time controls, and a Tactics Trainer-oriented mind helps. This kind of mindset is also why I would never ever intentionally play a move like elo123's.
Also, I think the OP confuses correlation with causation. Normally the causation is the other way around: being good at regular chess often means you're good at bullet.
elo123 wrote:
That's not true, Hikaru Nakamura is a top standard chess player and the best bullet player in the world. All the best bullet players are titled players because if you are good at bullet you are good at chess. So too if an opining works in bullet it works in standard.
Why couldnt i have ever run into you at a tournament???
Play me in Bullet,Blitz or whatever with this opening and I promise I'll trash you 100/100 times.
Ideas in bullet never really get out there in the chess world, cause like this, its STUPID!
Play this with me and I will kill you.
Jun 9, 2014
0
#9
You don't think by any chance, that your win is related to the fact that he was maybe just a wee bit careless with his pieces - such as the rook on a6, the pawn on e6, most notably the queen on a2...? And later the bishop on d1... basically he let you take anything you ever wanted... you think it's the opening then?
fireflashghost wrote:
Actually, better yet, please explain objectively what White gains from sacrificing the queen on f7 like that. Honestly, I don't see anything other than a pawn and the loss of Black's castling rights. If there isn't anything else than that, I don't see how it can be viable whatsoever, much less remotely sound, as an "opening novelty that always wins" in anything other than bullet.
Bet the Queen sac was a mistake
Jun 9, 2014
0
#11
"Bet the Queen sac was a mistake"
Obviously the queen sac was a mistake. With best play:
White is really hopeless. This is Stockfish's line, can't argue with that.
White is lost even if Balck blunders a rook and a bishop.
Twinchicky wrote:
"Bet the Queen sac was a mistake"
Obviously the queen sac was a mistake. With best play:
White is really hopeless. This is Stockfish's line, can't argue with that.
No human can play like Stockfish. For most people the positional and tactical considerations are good enough to give white excellent winning chances. I accept anyone's challenge who wants to play me with my opining.
Play me elo 123
elo123 wrote:
Twinchicky wrote:
"Bet the Queen sac was a mistake"
Obviously the queen sac was a mistake. With best play:
White is really hopeless. This is Stockfish's line, can't argue with that.
No human can play like Stockfish. For most people the positional and tactical considerations are good enough to give white excellent winning chances. I accept anyone's challenge who wants to play me with my opining.
I already challenged you in my first comment on this thread. In fact, I would happily challenge a grandmaster to try to beat me with White after 3.Qxf7+??.
Jun 9, 2014
0
#16
How do I create a custom starting position for a correspondence challenge again? I'll play you and guarantee I win.
I challenge you Elo.
I will give you credit elo123...you play like a typical beginner. Full of tactical fire. But after reviewing some of your games, you miss so many simple moves, all for the sake of a bad tactic.
Twinchicky wrote:
How do I create a custom starting position for a correspondence challenge again? I'll play you and guarantee I win.
lol.Obviously you're gonna win in correspondence.This guy is claiming that this opening works in bullet,so you have to beat him in bullet.
This sacrificial idea seems to work very well. Look at this bullet game for example:
And look in the chat how impressed my opponent was afterwards!