You ate literally the stupidest person I’ve seen here on chess.com. First you challenge me to play despite never having played the Sicilian before you guaranteed ahead of time that you would beat me an opponent rated hundreds of points higher than you. You use an engine in both games and manage to lose the second game because you were dumb enough to waste all your time bragging about how good your engines position was, and had to play on your own at the end and hung your queen. You then made a thread bragging about your engines victories and insulted me. You then got called out by a bunch of people who noticed that you used an engine in our games as well as many others. To cover up your engine use you then tried to delete the thread and pretend like it never happened.
aggressive London system
Actually you’ve done this many times. You’ve created a bunch of threads bragging about your rating increases and your “brilliant victories” then when people point out that you are actually an engine using cheat you delete your original post to try and cover up your engine use like people aren’t going to notice. How stupid can you get?
Okay, here we go, I'm gonna proof you are lying all the time.
Our first game:
You blunder your rook on move 9 and then the position plays itself.
Second game:
You play the best moves 95% of the time, the other 5% you played them so it's not so obvious that you are using an engine. In one of that 5% you blunder a knight but you aboslutely destroy my position anyway.
I showed the games and argumented what kind of person you are, you just insulted an lied...
If you go to your profile, everybody is saying that you are a cheater lol, watch mine, there are only good comments. Anyway your blitz graph tells by itself that you cheat.
Pd: I never did any post about my 'brilliany victories'. And I just deleted one post where I showed the games becouse someone told me that I could get reported for that.
You sir are gutsy I’ll give you that. The first game you clearly used an engine. Every move you played was perfect including move 13. Ne5!!!!! Where you move the knight en pride so that both my queen and knight can take it Both of which will eventually lead to me getting checkmated. Your telling me a 1400 rated blitz player found that one and calculated that by himself yeah right. But sure man the game played itself yeah right.
You sir are gutsy I’ll give you that. The first game you clearly used an engine. Every move you played was perfect including move 13. Ne5!!!!! Where you move the knight en pride so that both my queen and knight can take it Both of which will eventually lead to me getting checkmated. Your telling me a 1400 rated blitz player found that one and calculated that by himself yeah right. But sure man the game played itself yeah right.
Just to egg on this funny discourse...
Ne5 is not some shocking move at all. As soon as it's seen that Ne5 Nxe5 Qc7 at least wins the piece back, any fish would consider it.
You sir are gutsy I’ll give you that. The first game you clearly used an engine. Every move you played was perfect including move 13. Ne5!!!!! Where you move the knight en pride so that both my queen and knight can take it Both of which will eventually lead to me getting checkmated. Your telling me a 1400 rated blitz player found that one and calculated that by himself yeah right. But sure man the game played itself yeah right.
You don't seem very smart...
12. Qc2 Nc6 - I threaten checkmate and you block it
13. Ne5 Qxh2 - I attack the knight that is blocking checkmate (the queen can't take it) and you make a nonsense move hoping for me to go 14. Rf1
The second game my position was dead lost almost the entire game. I did not play the best move 95% of the time as you claim. In fact my position was completely lost until you hung your queen in major time trouble. Do you remember why you were in such major time trouble? This was because you spent most of your clock bragging about how good your engine was playing and how much better you were.
You sir are gutsy I’ll give you that. The first game you clearly used an engine. Every move you played was perfect including move 13. Ne5!!!!! Where you move the knight en pride so that both my queen and knight can take it Both of which will eventually lead to me getting checkmated. Your telling me a 1400 rated blitz player found that one and calculated that by himself yeah right. But sure man the game played itself yeah right.
Now I would like you to explain how you managed to make 90% of the moves perfect on the second game.
Everything you said was a complete lie, and I will address each one by one
Analyse my first game with stockfish 9 I'm not even close of making all perfect moves on any of the games
Everything you said was a complete lie, and I will address each one by one
Hahaha take it easy sicilian refutation kid, you got caught it's ok
I did not play even close to 90% best moves in the second game. I don’t even play 80. According to chess.coms engine I played about 75 % best move which would be pretty common for a 2000 rated player like myself
The second game my position was dead lost almost the entire game. I did not play the best move 95% of the time as you claim. In fact my position was completely lost until you hung your queen in major time trouble. Do you remember why you were in such major time trouble? This was because you spent most of your clock bragging about how good your engine was playing and how much better you were.
I never talked about any engine becouse I used none. You were wining the whole game till you made one of your moves so you didn't had a 100% best move and you are so bad that you blunder a knight but you kept using the engine and you was wining or draw, i cant remember, i'm gonna check it
First you claim you didn’t use an engine in game 1. I already explained why this was a complete lie.
22 moves you played in game 1 all of which were the perfect move. Incredible!!! Including the unbelievable 13. Ne5
Second you claim I used an engine in game 2 again complete nonsense. I played several blunders and every good move I made was logical. I was not executing brilliant piece sacrifices like you were with 13. Ne5
Third do you remember the 4 games you played immediately prior to the 2 you played with me? You played over 100perfect moves in a row. In 3 minute no increment blitz!!!!!! Incredible!!!!!
First you claim you didn’t use an engine in game 1. I already explained why this was a complete lie.
22 moves you played in game 1 all of which were the perfect move. Incredible!!! Including the unbelievable 13. Ne5
DUDE analyze it, no even half of them are best moves and the position played itself. 13.Ne5 is easy to see, you are a '2000+ rated' player, shouldnt you see it?
Back into saying dumb things he goes