Yeah that bishop on g7 that can move to 1 legal square is sure doing a lot...
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch

And if black can achieve e4 it can move to about 10 squares. I think white would be lost even if e4 was a pawn sacrifice, similar to the one seen in Anand-Gelfand (which, of course, wasn't a parham, but rather a grunfeld, my opening. Guess my openings are played in WC matches, but you brag that the parham was played once by Naka, for fun.)
Yeah that bishop on g7 that can move to 1 legal square is sure doing a lot...
sorry, but are you sure you don't need to review the rules, GM?

Ok, it can move to two squares, and 1 hangs a bishop, I was assuming you all weren't stupid, but I guess that I was mistaken.

There is nothing good about the Parham whatever way you look at it...
- Tactics =+ Black is the one with all the tactics
- Positional Desirability -+ Much better for Black
- General Principles -+ Moving the Queen violates this
- Problem pieces -+ White's pieces are misplaced

Ok, now we finally have come around to my point, I've been saving this one up for weeks. We have gone through over 100 pages of posts, 30 here, 40 on the old Parham, 30 on another parham attack thread, and a few other threads too.
I'm gonna say on average there are 20-25 posts per page, so that's over 2000 comments. It's taken 2000 comments to find just 1 line where black isn't crushed. In a real life game, you don't get 2000 tries to get it right. You get ONE TRY.
This is why this opening is good, it has taken you all THOUSANDS of tries to not get smoked by this opening, I would say an opening that it takes you 2000 tries to not get mowed over is pretty damn good, wouldn't you?

"Up a piece"
or not... Qa5+ deals with that nicely and black has a tidy advantage.
I thought you weren't allowed to use your queen in the first 40 moves, or at least that's whay you all have been saying for thousands of comments...
Ok, now we finally have come around to my point, I've been trolling for weeks. We have gone through over 100 pages of trolling, 30 here, 40 on the old Parham, 30 on another parham attack thread, and a few other threads too.
I'm gonna say on average there are 20-25 posts per page, so that's over 2000 comments. It's taken 2000 comments to find just 1 line where I understand black isn't crushed. In a real life game, you don't get 2000 tries to teach me right. You get ONE TRY.
This is why this !@#$ is good, it has taken you all THOUSANDS of tries to not get smoked by my trolling, I would say an opening that it takes you 2000 tries to not get dissed by me is pretty damn good, wouldn't you?
Logic.
"Up a piece"
or not... Qa5+ deals with that nicely and black has a tidy advantage.
I thought you weren't allowed to use your queen in the first 40 moves, or at least that's whay you all have been saying for thousands of comments...
Someone needs to understand the principles of chess, or quit chess.

So what you're saying is I can't use the queen in the first 40 moves, that's the general vibe you're all sending out...
And Rubidium, you're really funny bro. We gotta young Adam Sandler here.
So what you're saying is I can't use the queen in the first 40 moves, that's the general vibe you're all sending out...
And Rubidium, you're really funny bro. We gotta young Adam Sandler here.
You can get your queen in pretty early, but only if your attack is backed up:

I didn't say it, talk to joey about that one, anyways you guys are just talking about this pointless line because the Parham line was so good.
If the parham powns, perhaps 1 WCC would have noticed. Since most GMs play Roy Lopez, gavinator and what up must have figured out something countless GMs haven't. This makes Gavinator and What up and Parham the best chess players ever. Why would 2 out of three of the best players ever be posting on this kid's site?
And now black has 1 piece developed, and weak central pawns, while white has 4 pieces developed, and a solid position
Black is totally fine after 13. O-O a6 14. Nbc3 Be6 or 13. Nec3 d4 14. Bxf6 Qxf6.