A queen cannot go from e3 to h5.
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
Sort:
Rubidium wrote:
A queen cannot go from e3 to h5.
Yes it can, see above diagram. It is a super queen 
.
With a super queen, you can put a knight and queen in the same square, whatup. So why not QNh5 winning? Just remember you can't check with a knight.
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
instead of nxh5
qg5
you're gavinator, I'm ignoring you now you sad, sad child.
Rubidium wrote:
With a super queen, you can put a knight and queen in the same square, whatup. So why not QNh5 winning? Just remember you can't check with a knight.
I don't think the pgn editor will let me post a diagram showing this situation 
. It's not designed to handle super queens.
There is no point putting a finger at your ridiculous errors: The fool will always look at the finger.
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
well, im still better than you, but yeah i guess this line was mistake.
I'm the President of the US, and I have a bridge to sell to you.
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
well, im still better than you, but yeah i guess this line was mistake.
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
well, im still better than you, but yeah i guess this line was mistake.
Funniest quote ever.
Notice our new friend's name: whatupyodog2-5
At this rate, somebody should call the pound, soon...
So, I suppose I refuted the parham earlier with my nb4 variation. Glad we can ignore this thread now.
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
says the 1480 blitz rating.
My rating is less then 1100, actually, and yes, I still have a lot of improving to do, but that was the funniest quote I have heard.
...except the parham
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
well, im still better than you,
Professional GM that likes to troll!
[COMMENT DELETED]
Well yes, if you capture your own knight then black will be so chocked that he may or may not resign.
Maybe I should stop paying attention to you aswell now. Mostly because I get the feeling that you're gavinator on whatups account.