Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch

Sort:
Avatar of Rubidium
The_Gavinator wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
The_Gavinator wrote:
Rubidium wrote:

Chess.com might be messed up.

Maybe you're just dumb.

Insulting other members is against the rules.

Ok, here's a list of members that should be banned:

Alexlaw

BruceBenidict

CHCL

Helzeth

Jetfighter

Joeydivre

Nachtwulf

pfren

Rubidium

Shepi

TonyH

Vlad

Any I missed?

I'd rather have it alphabetized, if it doesn't matter to you.

Avatar of Eris_Discordia

What did Nachtwulf do?

Avatar of Yereslov
Rubidium wrote:
The_Gavinator wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
The_Gavinator wrote:
Rubidium wrote:

Chess.com might be messed up.

Maybe you're just dumb.

Insulting other members is against the rules.

Ok, here's a list of members that should be banned:

Alexlaw

BruceBenidict

CHCL

Rubidium

pfren

Helzeth

Jetfighter

Joeydivre

Nachtwulf

Shepi

TonyH

Vlad

Any I missed?

I'd rather have it alphabetized, if it doesn't matter to you.

People result to insult as a last desperate attack. 

Avatar of The_Gavinator

I listed people that insulted.

Avatar of Rubidium

Why create a list anyway?

Avatar of Yereslov
Firepower8 wrote:

I agree with no one that list except VladGhita, actually not even him, vlad may be a douche, but atleast he is a good player, and is helpful to some players

How does being a good player make you less of a douche?

That's like arguing that a Nazi who is great snooker is a saint.

Avatar of Rubidium

Why are we even arguing?

Shepi already beat it, so there's no reason to go on.

Avatar of Ben_Dubuque

yeah you forgot yourself and whatup. there by making your argument irrelivant.

Avatar of The_Gavinator

I was going to make that alphabetical, but I had too many names, sorry to disappoint you joey.

Avatar of Ben_Dubuque

no thats what you are getting, the rest of us are just happily agreeing with our refutations (Natuaul play and development) and laughing at this pathetic attempt at an attack that should only work in blitz

Avatar of Rubidium
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:

So, what we are getting at here is that the parham is unrefuted?

I don't see your logic.

Avatar of The_Gavinator

Then why has there been only one line, where many people, INCLUDING YOU JETFIGHTER!, think white has a better position.

Avatar of Yereslov
jetfighter13 wrote:

no thats what you are getting, the rest of us are just happily agreeing with our refutations (Natuaul play and development) and laughing at this pathetic attempt at an attack that should only work in blitz

A refutation is something that would give white a huge advantage. 

Everything white does is booked already. It's all part of the plan.

Avatar of Rubidium

After Na5 black can grab the bishop pair.

Avatar of The_Gavinator

While he wastes time doing that, white is going to win the f6 knight.

Avatar of Rubidium

Sorry.

Qxf6 Bxf6

Avatar of The_Gavinator

What are you talking about? STOP TROLLING!!

Avatar of Rubidium
The_Gavinator wrote:

While he wastes time doing that, white is going to win the f6 knight.

Avatar of Rubidium

I agree

Avatar of Rubidium

post 1000

This forum topic has been locked